English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I thought the pieces would completely almost dissapear, as the case of the one that hit the pentagon, and crashed in that field. Only pictures I ever saw was a handfull of pieces, that on closer inspection did'nt even belong to the same jet?

Whatever..

2007-05-06 15:30:24 · 4 answers · asked by █ORal-K 2 in News & Events Media & Journalism

the plane that hit the pentagon was'nt goin at top speed, ontop of the fact that the pilot did a superhuman feat of controlling the passenger jet 15 feet above the ground before it hit. (All this from a virtually untrained pilot..amazing, even skilled fighter pilots have trouble doin this in a nimble jet!)

Incidentally the multiple gas station camera's that have yet to be released (why being held as classified??) without edited video frames.

And they call me a wacko..I guess u sheep are too scared to ask the right questions huh

2007-05-06 16:15:12 · update #1

4 answers

To one of the 28% who still believe 3 towers fell from 2 planes hitting them and that 2 planes that vaporzed on impact.What happend to the 2, 6 ton titanium engines that supposable hit the pentagon and in pennsylvania oh yes they vaporized just like the other three coincidenses.5 first time ever in history to disappear on impact. I work with titanium it does not disapear just like the black boxes ther made not to.are you that blind?wtc 7 still has no official cause in fact this week it was in the paper that the cause they gave(debris flying through the air and again setting an internal fire that must have set off more fuel in the tower.the cause was rejected. And why was the 200 billion in gold found moved under wtc5,and howed they know to move it and i guess its acoincidence bushes brother ran the security team that was running emergency evac drills 2 weeks prior.then again you probrably believe there are weapons of mass destruction

2007-05-06 16:33:25 · answer #1 · answered by chuck g 1 · 1 0

Well. well, well.
We need conspirator theorists like me. The people that are going to investigate events that invoke hard questions. I don't know why people, that think we are wrong, and still go to the Answer choice, and repeat the same old lines about us, that fight for the Truth. Conspirators, a lot of bad names I would never repeat, death threats, communist, etc. That doesn't bother me -- just another person too mean to be real.

Very good site Ifrom a biased
http://thunderbay.indymedia.org/news/2004/09/15351.php


http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?_adv_prop=images&imgsz=all&imgc=&vf=all&va=kenya+crash&fr=b1ie7&ei=UTF-8

Chuck -- Yes ---- read chuk's very short but great answer.

Questions?
http://www.flight93crash.com/second-plane-at-flight93-crash-site.htm
(what happend to the links?)

Pentagon debris-
http://www.flight93crash.com/flight93_secondary_debris_field.html


Flight 93 Eyewitness Accounts
A lot of links, on these sites don't work here unless you copy the URL and paste it into a search box.
Haven't got a theory on that.

http://us-pentagon.tripod.com/cache/dailyamerican/disaster.html

http://www.flight182.com/part28.htm Air India

2007-05-06 23:02:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know why I bother explaining this to conspiracy theorists. I know that none is so blind as he who will not see. Here for the last time, if you fly a commercial airplane at top speed into a building you will not find much recognizable debris. If the plane crash lands you will find debris scattered in the direction the plane was flying before it hit the ground. If the plane flew nose first into the ground you would find a hole and little recognizable debris.

This is all so obvious. What is your real motivation to keep on with these silly conspiracy theories?

2007-05-06 22:43:02 · answer #3 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 0 2

I wish i could give ya 10 points for that one-)

2007-05-07 02:43:58 · answer #4 · answered by V 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers