I have 10K in my 401K. I tend to roll it over to Roth, taxed once and never again, since only 4000 per year contribution is allowed, I can only rollover 10K this year 4000 and then next year 5000 and the rest, bit by bit? is that right? And I have to rolloever to a rollover IRA first right? Sincce I can only contribute 4000 or 5000 per year, the growth is not as large as if I have a larger lump sum compare to traditional. Unless I know by the time I retire, I am in a lower tax bracket... then traditional is good? I am confused, or maybe either turns out to be the same? I know traditional is tax deductable, Roth you can take the contributions out penalty free after 5 years. I read motley fool example and they said Roth is a bit better, but now I'm not sure. let's just say, I can pay the tax now if I move it to Roth, but still, I can't roll it all at once, correct?
2007-09-25
07:28:05
·
5 answers
·
asked by
dknc2000
2