I guess I need to clarify my previous question. I'm wondering more about the "organized" part of religion. Something more like this:
Should we work ourselves around a specific religion, or would that be ignorant? Is it not better to maybe grow up practicing a certain religion, and then to question it? In the end, we either find a religion that is more believeable, or are drawn closer to our original beliefs. How do we choose and truly believe "x" religion if we never question? In order for the belief to be true, isn't self-love and understanding a prerequisite?
Moreover, doesn't everyone have different beliefs? Some people believe in God, some people don't. Some people believe in Jesus, others follow Buddah. Then you get into a few of the complexities of teachings, and how each ought to be worshiped. But... is that it? Why do we draw the line on subdivisions there? Once that line is drawn, we're oppressed by the religious sophists and, whether one likes it or not, a damper is placed upon their spirituality.
In the sermon today, our priest stressed "the church vs passions". He said that in order for us to follow the lord, we have to be accountable. This is why the church tells us to fast on "x" day, and we should follow- irregardless of what we think.
But isn't that the greatest paradox of all? Apparently, there's no room for interpretation. When, to me, that's all religion is.
I am a spiritual person, and believe in many concepts of the Orthodox faith. But I'm starting to question ORGANIZED religion. Any thoughts?
2007-11-25
06:10:28
·
11 answers
·
asked by
live*laugh*love
4
in
Philosophy