English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am looking for a contrasting opinion, an objection or a counterexample to Plato's allegory represented by some other famous philosopher. Thank you!!!

2007-11-25 07:00:48 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

3 answers

If I am right, Sextus Empiricus (the reason empiricism is called what it is) was an early if not the first, advocate of the 'nothing but sense impressions' school. From that standpoint, what you see is what you get and if something is behind your perceptions, you won't know it's there.

Whether or not he's right, is another matter.

2007-11-25 07:14:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Aristotle, Plato's most famous student (and one of the most influential people in all of human history) objected to one of the central features of the the Cave analogy: it seems to "duplicate" the world of the senses (the Cave world) with a world above that was like the world of the Cave but consisted of objects intuited only by reason rather than the senses. Aristotle held that this "duplication" was pointless and actually ran counter to the principles of reason, since it is unnecessary to assert the existence of entities other than those present to the senses.

2007-11-25 12:51:12 · answer #2 · answered by geor2 2 · 0 0

How about a parody?

“Life in this world,” he said, “is, as it were, a sojourn in a cave. What can we know of reality? For all we see of the true nature of existence is, shall we say, no more than bewildering and amusing shadows cast upon the inner wall of the cave by the unseen blinding light of absolute truth, from which we may or may not deduce some glimmer of veracity, and we as troglodyte seekers of wisdom can only lift our voices to the unseen and say, humbly, ‘Go on, do Deformed Rabbit . . . it’s my favorite.’ ”

2007-11-25 07:43:05 · answer #3 · answered by Samwise 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers