This tries to question the common perception that change is the only thing constant in this world... If this perception were true, why were the fundamental laws of nature applicable right from the beginning of time... aren't they also constants to begin with? Basically, I think that change is a concept introduced by man because he doesn't have the capability to full grasp the cycles that happen in the earth... For example, the life cycle of humans... Viewed by phases - adolescence, puberty, adulthood - they all represent the changes that a human undergoes... But viewed from its totality, they are actually constants in the equation called human life... So maybe, change is not really as constant as we see it today... Despite the fact that some of these changes, are dramatic, they may actually be constants, in some equation which we have no capability of understanding nor comprehending yet! This question is basically to get the general perception of Yahoo people, so pls ans respnsbly...
2007-03-15
20:00:23
·
8 answers
·
asked by
windsinger
2
in
Philosophy