A nation which was unfairly forced to pay the military expense after World War I was reasonable to do some ''feedback'' for themselves. Nazi-Germany could be any nation, Hitler could be other person. The consequence of WWII was varied by so many factors. The holocaust which killed 11 millions jews were not Hitler's own thought, it was the thought of a large population of Nazi-Germany. This ''event'' was also determined by so many factors, not that Hitler could control. The animosity against jewish in Nazi-Germany was not a thing that Hitler could change. However, I believe that the discrimination against jewish at that time was part of their own responsbility, because of their behaviours in WWI. Why the majority in this society, or as least people in my school, rejected to respect the motiviation of Hitler as the way that we respect the human right?
2007-02-08
15:13:05
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
History