or just a lazy way of saying that this is good enough?
No one would ride in an airplane if it had a 99% chance of landing safely. At that rate, there would be hundreds of plane crashes every day.
Shouldn't we demand better? Shouldn't we demand that we know with absolute certainty global warming was real before we take action? After all, if we aren't sure that global warming is real, we could take actions that don't help or even end up causing more harm than good.
Shouldn't we demand that climatologist first be able to forecast the climate 1 month, then 6 months, then 1 year, 2 years then 5 years out first?
Why should we submit to lazy science that leaves so much room for uncertainty?
2007-12-28
08:18:01
·
27 answers
·
asked by
Dr Jello
7
in
Global Warming