Well, I'm here to say, Oh hecky naw! That male does not represent me or any other Quran following Muslim who just want to live in peace and raise their families, following Islam of course so that their wives are just as much a part of society as the men are according to the Sunnah. His violence is against Islam. Nobody attacked him, he had no right to kill 3000 people that day nor any other innocent people he's murdered using his brainwashed nutjobs. What do you think of this?
"All this amounts to an odd and extreme violation of the normal methods of Islamic scholarship. Had the authors of such fatwas [non-binding legal opinions] followed the norms of their religion, they would have had to acknowledge that no school of traditional Islam allows the targeting of civilians. An insurrectionist who kills non-combatants is guilty of baghy, "armed transgression", a capital offence in Islamic law.
2007-09-08
10:47:03
·
28 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality