With the geo column stating that dinosaurs found in layers of rock dating so and so millions of years the question is:
Why is it sooo much easier to find dinosaurs that have been dead for at least 65 million years, than cro-magnum and any other form of man that havfe been dead for only 3 million years.
Cro-magnum, erectus, and habilius should be the frisdt things we encounter when we dig, instead it's easier to find dinos extinct for said millions of years in a column which indicates our ancient man cousins should be arrvinig first.
If anyone goes on about the difficulty of fossilisation after 3 million years, bear in mind they have found fossilised hats, hammers and cowboy boots, with fossilised cowboy feet inside them.
Further, if extinction and evo depend on changes to habitat, and some creatures have survived such as the caelocanth as its habitat is unchaged, then why did cro-mags, erectus, and habilius man dissapear?They lived in caves and jungles, which we still have today
2007-09-05
11:42:41
·
3 answers
·
asked by
ki_utopia
3
in
Earth Sciences & Geology