...rather than actual subject matters of knowledge? For example, the stronger inclination to study the philosophies of math, music, sciences, etc rather than actually engaging in math, music, sciences, more or less to this extent. One may be an dabbler but not expert in anything and still carry on this "need" to engage in metanalyses.
Does this indicate anything about stamina/intelligence/industry? I would think that the activity of engaging in the metaanalysis of physics requires less than getting seriously involved in theoretical physics, for example.
2007-09-04
17:05:23
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Pansy
4
in
Philosophy