Of course it's embarrassing to the Republican party, and to the man himself, seeing as how he's married, and a father, etc...
But, if the man did "nothing wrong" in that bathroom, wouldn't the easiest solution to the scandal be to just tell the truth about what happened, and explain why he "did nothing wrong"?
The fact that he has not done so is pretty much an admission that he got freaky with his homeboys in the bathroom stall. It's like pleading "no contest".
Come on, folks, let's just be honest here. :)
Anyone see differently? Is there some reason I am missing as to why this guy would refrain from justifying himself?
2007-09-01
21:18:13
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Law & Ethics