In my family, the RH problem reared its ugly head.
Because of this, my mother had two still births and lost a pair of twins.
Two of my brothers and myself are only alive because we had transfusions at birth.
While I know there are now other ways to deal with RH, which saved my son from needing a transfusion, those options weren't available in the 60s.
I've had JWs in the past try to tell me that they would never allow there own child to have a transfusion and that my mother should have let my brothers and I die.
How can they possibly justify this stand and expect someone who is alive only because of a transfusion to agree with them?
2007-06-27
13:24:45
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality