Of which there are plenty, by the way....but I'm wondering what you think of the Archaeopteryx, a missing link between reptiles and birds?
"It had bird characters, feathers and wings. It also had reptilian characters, the skeleton of a small theropod (flesh-eating) dinosaur, with a long bony tail, fingers with claws on the leading edge of the wing, and teeth in the jaws. A further seven skeletons have come to light. In addition, fantastic new specimens of birds have been found in Spain and China, which are some 30 or 40 million years younger than Archaeopteryx, and they are more bird-like, exactly as an evolutionist predicts. The new Spanish and Chinese birds have short bony tail tails, and their hand claws are reduced - they are becoming more bird-like. The Chinese localities have not only produced amazing new birds, but also new dinosaur specimens with feathers"
Even with this kind of hard evidence, EXACTLY what so many of you ask for, do you still deny transitional fossils exist??
2007-05-24
16:14:30
·
26 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality