Before I say anything else- this is an honest question, so you flame, you get reported. That being said; DO you think the majority of skeptics, are too dismissive of the paranormal (religion included) or do you think they actually want to know the truth. It’s my personal opinion that if I popped up with a video of an interview with a ghost taken from three different camera’s and corroborated by 85 people, I’d still be dismissed as a fraud, because people don’t want to know, they just want to defend their beliefs. What would a person have to do to prove the paranormal to the average skeptic? Do you think skeptics find a way to MAKE something explainable even if the explanation makes less sense than a paranormal conclusion? Isnt this just as bad as a person who blindly believes in the paranormal WITHOUT evidence? If you’re going to respond with “It would never happen cause it’s not real” don’t bother this is hypothetical, and I don’t want that kind of response, I want real mind searching
2007-05-18
02:26:48
·
23 answers
·
asked by
Goddess Nikki
4
in
Religion & Spirituality