Atheists look around themselves and say "the creation doesn't prove a creator!", it's all how you interpret it.
Well, let's ask atheists to provide proof for evolution. But you can't advance anything that must be interpreted. Fossils aren't proof because they need interpretation. Were they laid down in the flood, or were they buried in a "geologic layer" corresponding to an evolutionary epoch? Both are interpretations based on a belief system.
Micro-mutations cannot be advanced as proof of evolution because all they have been observed to do is serve as a quality control mechanism, never a speciation converter.
If you hold evolution as scientific fact, yet you cannot produce proof, your belief in evolution is a religion, no different than my belief in creation.
Please no ad homonym attacks. Don't call me names, or make derogatory comments about how stupid religion is, or that God doesn't exist. Yeah, we've heard it all before. It's neither interesting or enlightening.
2007-05-17
10:50:19
·
24 answers
·
asked by
s2scrm
5
in
Religion & Spirituality