On here and on other religious discussion forums, where some of the religious, predominantly christian, severely incorrect perspectives on science and scientific conclusions are then corrected, do these people then take away this new knowledge and remain enlightened, or is there some form of denial or editing process where their incorrect assumptions are repeated elsewhere?
When an attack on science is based on incorrect assumptions, and is then clearly exposed as an incorrect assumption, how do these people then quantify their position on the matter?
Surely it must then change, and old incorrect assumptions are never to be repeated.
And if not, why not? And what is the mechanism that shuts the door on any enlightening information?
2007-05-07
19:53:51
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality