that less people decided to keep weapons just in-case they need to defend themselves, then there would be less need to defend themselves.
like womd, gw bush decides its ok for his country to have them because hes 'trust worthy', but not others.
if he set an example for the world rather than be an antagonist, and a 'do as i say not as i do', less countries would be pisssed off with the usa.
if there were less guns there would be less chance of accidents involving children, less desensitisation to killing and so forth
its a domino effect, either way
australia has a strict gun ownership policy, and even though there may be still a few occurances of death and crime involving guns, i dread to think of what it would be like if it was a free for all.
i'd be terified to walk down the street if i knew most people had guns.
not saying all gun users are flipo's but some are.
i feel safer with a low tolerace of guns society, than a 'needing' to own a gun society
2007-04-19
02:08:28
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality