You know, objectives that are met, goals that are accomplished? Training security forces instead of using soldiers for police? Reduce the combat from the US, and increase the training? And develop a plan that includes goals and periodic reviews, like EVERY training plan? What is the problem with this? And don't tell me 'the terrorists will just wait us out' because once security forces are trained, they can take on that responsibility. We should cater to the majority of Iraq, not the minority of criminals who might continue to do harm. Our plan should revolve around the people of Iraq, not the terrorists of the world. Maybe we should separate the two for a minute and deal with one thing at a time. What do you think? And remember, I am entitled to my opinion, so please don't call me names.
2007-04-04
06:04:56
·
9 answers
·
asked by
hichefheidi
6
in
Politics