Yesterday Limbaugh discussed how the New York Times published a piece criticizing Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth", quickly connected the dot of how amazing this was since the NYT's is a liberal media outlet, then, stated, he suspected the Clintons were behind having the article published, to diminish Gore's chances at running for President.
This is absurd. Being a reader of the New York Times, I have found their reporting, on the whole, balanced and thoughtful, not some rantonous liberal rag. The article discussing Inconvenient Truth is attached below, it, is, a balanced and fair, but with a critical eye, piece of jounalism.
The new york times chief editors, or those that select stories to print, are not coerced to run stories on behalf of the Clintons.
In fact, an editorial was printed two weeks ago was highly critical of, in their words, "the junior senator from New York". Limbaugh has created myths, that sadly, neoconservatives buy into and are entertained by.
2007-03-16
01:49:44
·
22 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics