It's one thing to go into battle with alacrity, knowing that you're safe from harm's way, and not having to deal with the struggles of inconvenient living standards and the dangers from it. But it's another to have blood, people you love dearly, who by your decisions are sent to a russian roulette with death, who have to endure the fruits of your decisions to save a country so to speak. So would he still be as anxious to extend this 'mission' as it seems there isn't a 'war' now but more of a means of controlling a violent political/religious war between sunni and shiites, knowing that his 2 sons would be amidst the violence?
2006-12-21
19:09:46
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Dennis
6
in
Other - Politics & Government