This on all accounts proven by history to be a bold face editing by the church after the 4th century! Pre-Nicene there is a heavy amount of evidence through early church writers, such as all of the church fathers which supports this to have been changed to support the Jesus-god lie and the trinity. The real Baptism scene in this true nature said this, "Thou art my son, THIS DAY have I begotten thee." (Hebrew 1:5, Ps 2:7) Not that he was the son before, but that at the baptism was his TRUE birth, when he gained sonship and the indwelling logos/mind of God expressed through him. I'm not Muslim at all, but they have a point with respect to Jesus historically (except for the virgin birth, that wasn't in the Hebrew gospel which is the bible that Matthew came from, historically from testimony of church fathers and historians). Why change this? Sources below in detail.
2006-12-13
22:16:35
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Automaton
5
in
Religion & Spirituality