By this i mean way back in the early 1800s, the Supreme Court Judge John Marshall gave the power to declare whether or not a law is unconstitional or not to the Judicial branch in a very famous Supreme Court Case. Well, it still stands today, and was just recently used and stopped the wire-tapping because they declared it unconstitutional. But since the Judicial Branch did that, does that mean what it does unconstitutional, since it's job is to punish criminals, and not create laws?(It created a law by saying this law was null, just like the emancipation proclamation towards slavery, a law to get rid of another law)
2006-09-14
13:55:20
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics