Why is it that when the argument of stem cell, genetic sequence, and genetic markering comes up our representatives pander to the less informed with an argument that they could be the victims of "genetic discrimination"? We live in a world where the strong rule and the fittest survive, why would we think that we can turn our backs on a technology that will be explored anyway? Maybe its just me but it sounds like those representatives want to put the people in a position where thier discrimination is a definite. Any thoughts.
2006-07-24
03:51:08
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Law & Ethics