First, I will admit my bias - I can't stand the DH.
But I will be open minded in reviewing answers to my question. Should guys who are DH for most of their career (E. Martinez, Baines, F. Thomas, Ortiz) have their offensive numbers be held to a higher standard when considered for the HOF. Remember, these guys do not play or contribute to half of the game. Also, out of the five "tools" they are minus in two categories (defense and arm) and are usually poor in a third (base running).
I am NOT saying a long-time DH should not make the Hall, but I do think they must be held to a higher standard - even at the expense of traditional benchmarks like 3,000 hits and 500 home runs.
ANd I am NOT talking about a Mike Piazza who finishes his career as a DH.
Interested in your feedback - most cogent answer gets 10 points
2007-08-06
09:20:38
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Matt G
5