In the USA, at least, the religious are more likely to reproduce and to have more offspring if they reproduce than are the irreligious. Likewise, religious attitudes, including irreligion, are heavily influenced by upbringing. Interestingly enough, the most commonly accepted "objective" measure of evolutionary fitness is a count of grandoffspring. That is, if ones genes are more "fit", then it is logical that this would manifest in greater reproductive success for ones children. Therefore, since the religious are:
1: More likely to reproduce.
2: More likely to have religious offspring.
3: More likely to have more offspring, altogether.
It is only rational to conclude that they will have more grandoffspring than the irreligious.
Thus, could they be more evolutionarily fit than the irreligious?
2007-11-20
07:09:29
·
20 answers
·
asked by
Hoosier Daddy
5