Notice I did NOT say that atheists do not have morals--I thank God that many, perhaps even MOST of them do.
But do you see the inconsistency in the following behaviors of atheists:
If human life is no more sacred or special than rodent life or even a stand of trees, then how can atheists defend incarcerating people for killing people, when they don't impose the same punishment for people who use mousetraps or who make a living as lumberjacks?
If the most moral decision, as many atheists believe, is the one that brings about the greatest good for the greatest amount of people, then would not the highest moral decision be to eliminate all suffering on the earth, by eliminating all beings CAPABLE of sufferering?
If the earth is just one of millions or billions of places in the universe where life exists, and the life there isn't all that special, wouldn't blowing up the planet be as inconsequential as, for instance, squashing a bug?
Thank God, atheists don't have the guts.
2006-08-14
16:15:49
·
24 answers
·
asked by
miraclewhip
3