My observation is that regardless of sexual orientation both genders operate and oscillate to and fro between a "Masculine Mode" and a "Feminine Mode" in physiological and psychological functions. For instance, the masculine mode is the modus operandi of putting forth, building, construction, the doing, the ejecting into the world and impregnation; while the feminine mode is the modus operandi of the intuiting, the dissecting, the organizing, the contemplative of things, the ingesting, the absorbing, the taking in, the compartmentalizing and the inspiring. Thus, an architect must shift into the feminine mode to design a building, evaluating and organizing the spatial relations, analyzing the dimensions and appropriate materials. When he is finished, he then hands the blueprints over to the contractor, and she must shift into the masculine mode to materialize the final tangible structure, the doing, the poring of the foundational slab and the building. What are you thoughts on this?
2006-11-24
06:36:51
·
9 answers
·
asked by
.
5