ie, wd it so reduce overpower and lift underpay, that world violence wd be reduced to survivable levels? ie, wd it be perceived as sufficient increase of justice, to reduce violence [oppressing the weaker [slavery, exploitation, warmongering, cannonfoddering, plunderers plundering], attacking the richer [mafias coming up from the bottom, the plundered plundering the plunderers] to survivable levels?
it probably wouldnt reduce violence enough for happiness [peace, safety, global quietness] but it might be enough for survival - the reduction of overpower would not be great, but the reduction of the most extreme, most violence-generating, underpay would be significant
would limiting fortunes to $100 million bring survival and global calm? reduction of tyrannous overpower and corruption would start to be significant, the richest would be ceasing to be: above the democratic law, writing laws to suit themselves, breaking the law with impunity & with the protection of the lawkeepers
2006-10-10
14:42:34
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Economics