Astronomy & Space - August 2007

That we know of.

2007-08-16 12:20:41 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Some people believe something (even life itself) sprang from nothing! Why would anything just show up in nothing? Time itself doesn't do anything. Things do happen over time, its not time that makes them happen. If originally there was absolutely nothing, wouldn't there be absolutely nothing now? Absolutely nothing never existed! If it did, there wouldn't be anything outside it to cause the existence of anything! You are proof that absolutely nothing never existed. What's your feedback on all this?

2007-08-16 12:15:53 · 8 answers · asked by ZORRO 3

Adding on to the question if there is would there be enough so our universe would reconstrict into a pinpoint

2007-08-16 12:06:28 · 4 answers · asked by Jok 1

If an object is traveling at the speed of light, gives off light in all directions, does the light given off towards the opposite direction of the object "stay there"?

2007-08-16 12:04:31 · 6 answers · asked by Masaki 367 2

2007-08-16 12:00:55 · 2 answers · asked by chasity l 1

I am searching for a site(s) that teaches space mathematics.

2007-08-16 11:33:09 · 3 answers · asked by journey 1

2007-08-16 11:23:34 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

If a planet, or something putting of light was suddenly flung from its pont of origin and was moving faster than the speed of light, and for instance your were at the point of origin, and you were looking at the planet hurlling away from you, would the light still reach your eyes because it was at 1 time where you are? I know thats kinda confusing but thats the reason Im asking it.

2007-08-16 11:14:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-16 11:08:56 · 28 answers · asked by pauline_pltodd 1

2007-08-16 11:05:35 · 23 answers · asked by KERRY R 1

2007-08-16 10:54:39 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/08/16/scispeed116.xml


If this is true, it changes EVERYTHING. Even though photons have no mass, a technology based on this could enable instantaneous communication with deep space probes.

2007-08-16 10:53:08 · 11 answers · asked by Beetso 2

A watch at sea level and at the top of Mt Everest will move at slightly different speeds. So, when you take our perception of time here on earth and compare it with the perception of time on some distant star or planet, what is a year to us may be several decades or centuries out there. So, a distant star could give every indication of being of being millions of 'earth years' old..... Interesting.

2007-08-16 10:52:28 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Like when astronauts go to space, can they take a bag of small rocks, and hurl them at Earth, then, after a day or two, when the rocks enter the atmosphere, they burn up, and can be seen as a "meteor shower". Can this idea work? Why or why not?

2007-08-16 10:31:17 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-16 10:28:16 · 5 answers · asked by ...Øяρh°° 3

have there been so many accounts about encounters with them over the century? How is it possible that all these people report the same thing? And if it's just a houx, why did so many people give accounts of these encounters. I mean i just saw today over at Youtube this whole UFO interview thing that showed vids that claims to be an actual footage of an ET. Its like the more i know, the more i don't know. What is your take on this?

2007-08-16 10:23:01 · 22 answers · asked by Man 5

I finally came across some facts in finding UFO information from this website:
http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/ufo.htm

How much does it cost to get a request when you send the form?
http://foia.fbi.gov/foia_request.htm

It doesn't even mention what fee?

2007-08-16 10:07:13 · 7 answers · asked by Agent319.007 6

They were'nt as good as what they said they would be but i did see some, did anyone else out there?

2007-08-16 10:06:33 · 14 answers · asked by LouLou 4

do you guyz belive in travel? like is it posible??

2007-08-16 10:04:44 · 11 answers · asked by smplytffny 2

This has been answered poorly many times before with answers about bright backgrounds, etc. But there are never any answers as to why pictures with very low light background, such as pictures of asteriods (NEAR) and others have no stars in the background. If you see pictures with stars in the background, the stars have been added.

One example of this deceit is at the site below where NASA has clearly superimposed the constellation Orion on top of the Aurora! You can clearly see that the stars are in front of the Aurora, not seen through the Aurora!! NASA continues to decieve the public over this star issue.

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap970126.html

2007-08-16 10:01:36 · 22 answers · asked by enternewid 2

In an impermeable barrier, let's say 1000 miles from the surface. Would the heat buildup eventually make it explode (thus presumably rebounding indefinitely inside there)? Or would it be able to absorb/distribute all that heat on its surface (and within) without catastrophic consequences? And if it would eventually detonate, how long before that would happen?

2007-08-16 09:39:25 · 6 answers · asked by Omar Cayenne 7

2007-08-16 09:33:37 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am willing to undertake this dangerous mission for my country

2007-08-16 08:32:20 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

Opinions?

2007-08-16 08:31:29 · 5 answers · asked by Soulbow 2

Ok. it's a crazy question, but if we see right now the past of the galaxies and stars when we look at space. and if we look farther out, we can see how galaxies and stars where millions of years ago, this means that the farther we see the older the images are.

is it possible that if we see far far beyond that, can we see the big bang in proccess? i mean can we actually see the hole mass and energy that existed before the big bang explotion?

do i made myself clear? .. i mean imagine that we have the most powerfull telescope that could see as far as the last remaining star of the universe and we pointed directly to the center of the universe, what would we see? if the universe is 13.7billions years old and our telescope would reach that distance what would we see then?

2007-08-16 08:27:23 · 8 answers · asked by Punk_Rckr83 2

Its true I downloaded the application form just in case my ex fancied it.

2007-08-16 08:26:30 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

so basically all of the energy and TIME in the universe was clumped together in a little ball smaller than a grain of sand. then it exploded, and several seconds after that we have a period called quark soup. after that the universe cooled and atoms formed and now the universe is expanding faster and faster.

my question is, what is beyond the universe. think about it. matter and even light, can only travel so fast. so if u traveled far enough u would reach the end, the end of everything. but thats the problem, there cant be an end, its simply impossible. its not like there is a wall and all of the sudden u cant go any farther. so there has to be an area with nothingness, and since there is no energy or matter there, it would be uneffected be the big bang, so it would had to have been there before the big bang.

2007-08-16 08:02:27 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do they exsist? If they do what do they do? Are they the opposite to black holes? Do they spew time and light back into the universe?

2007-08-16 07:58:41 · 11 answers · asked by Ben P 2

if everyone in the world ran the same way at the same time, would it effect the earth's rotation?

2007-08-16 07:58:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-16 07:52:54 · 5 answers · asked by STORMY K 3