English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Astronomy & Space - August 2007

[Selected]: All categories Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

I've been asked to explain why i said thinking people will question ,doubt or disbelieve that we landed on the moon in 1969. 1) motive ; in the heat of the cold war the u.s. was desperate to score p.r. wins over the communist soviets. 2)indirect proof ; there is a ton ,read the whistleblowers. evidence includes same background pictures, artifical lighting, wind, and a host of other things 3) neal armstrong has never done public interviews to this day. he is a recluse. when asked about all the attention he was getting he replied "i don't deserve it". 4) precedent; why would have a manned walk on the moon in the 60s and not have a manned walk on mars almost 40 years later!!!!! It dosen't make since unless.... 5 in conclusion; blindly believing our government when it doesn't add up certaintly fits the criteria of not thinking for yourself.

2007-08-31 08:32:31 · 20 answers · asked by doc_of_three 2

Is there any theories or Hypotheses?

2007-08-31 08:29:16 · 5 answers · asked by Justin L 4

I've been asked to explain why i said thinking people will question ,doubt or disbelieve that we landed on the moon in 1969. 1) motive in the heat of the cold war the u.s. was desperate to score p.r. wins over the communist soviets. 2)indirect proof there is a ton ,read the whistleblowers. evidence includes same background pictures, artifical lighting, wind, and a host of other things 3) neal armstrong has never done public interviews to this day. he is a recluse. when asked about all the attention he was getting he replied "i don't deserve it". 4) precedent why would have a manned walk on the moon in the 60s and not have a manned walk on mars almost 40 years later!!!!! It dosen't make since unless.... 5 in conclusion blindly believing are government when it doesn't add up certaintly fits the criteria of not thinking for yourself.

2007-08-31 08:21:15 · 11 answers · asked by doc_of_three 2

From Yahoo! News (via AFP) : "The only moon landing in history is NASA's Apollo expedition in 1968."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070831/sc_afp/russiaspacemoon

2007-08-31 08:03:14 · 13 answers · asked by red_draik_plushie 2

2007-08-31 07:57:05 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-31 07:55:02 · 10 answers · asked by reneee! ;] 1

2007-08-31 07:44:03 · 14 answers · asked by iloveproblems 1

i only caughted a glimpse didnt see the actual story so if you did then tell me please,

2007-08-31 07:22:37 · 7 answers · asked by roan 2

2007-08-31 06:40:16 · 8 answers · asked by certifiednut1@yahoo.com 1

I know spherometers are used to measure concave hand-ground mirror surfaces, but I want to know what I'd use to measure a convex surface if I tried grinding my own refractor lense.

I wouldn't do it by hand though, I'd try to make like a pottery spinning wheel and automatically do the grinding by keeping the pressure, rpm , and exposure time constant, and just measuring the surface till I got it right. But I'd need something to measure the surface with. What do I do ?

2007-08-31 05:49:34 · 2 answers · asked by fuck y 1

It is going to come within 22,000 miles of Earth in 2029 (one tenth the distance to the moon) but on it's next 7 year orbit it will be on a direct collision course.

2007-08-31 05:46:43 · 18 answers · asked by GBH 1

2007-08-31 05:44:55 · 11 answers · asked by Irish 1

i thik the sun will heat it up to much and will make it explode!

2007-08-31 05:42:27 · 24 answers · asked by casey 5

Hello I've been reading and watching on TV about space and stuff,and i was wondering what is out side of space?Where is the end of the Universe?Does anyone know or has a clue or something?

2007-08-31 04:48:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-31 04:46:08 · 6 answers · asked by ♥kenz♥ 2

can we keep up fighting harm.... everyday i another threat to the human race how long can we do this ...even survive?

2007-08-31 04:34:17 · 11 answers · asked by JAEKOB V 1

i read russia plans a manned misson to the moon by 2025. why would it take so long if we did it in 1969. i believe the first lunar landing was a hoax , i'm not as sure about the next 5. something is fishy at nasa. only a non thinking person would believe what were told about the moon landings.

2007-08-31 04:25:42 · 4 answers · asked by doc_of_three 2

2007-08-31 04:00:22 · 11 answers · asked by soya j 1

I heard there's a Russian mission planned 2025. Why are people not constantly going back and forth if it was possible 40 years ago?

2007-08-31 03:59:16 · 15 answers · asked by Pie 3

my guess is that they (photons) must move around any particles they incounter in an atmosphere. any ideas out there? thanks

2007-08-31 03:55:57 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-31 03:27:23 · 3 answers · asked by twapped2000 2

I'm new to the hobby and am trying to avoid the usual mistakes noobs make. From what I have read many of them come with a cooling fan....can anyone shed some light on why a light box would need a cooling fan?

2007-08-31 02:59:28 · 5 answers · asked by brianguillot 2

The moon is a natural resourse and needs exploiting

2007-08-31 02:15:01 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

scienstists claim that the present continents were once a single land mass and that there are signs of reunion of these continents though not shortly

2007-08-31 01:50:12 · 12 answers · asked by Simpson 1

2007-08-31 00:35:33 · 15 answers · asked by Nand 2

fedest.com, questions and answers