manned misson to the moon in 2025?

Question

i read russia plans a manned misson to the moon by 2025. why would it take so long if we did it in 1969. i believe the first lunar landing was a hoax , i'm not as sure about the next 5. something is fishy at nasa. only a non thinking person would believe what were told about the moon landings.

Answer 1

>> why would it take so long if we did it in 1969.<<

Money. The space agencies are funded largely by government, and if government decides not to give them the money and the mandate to go to the Moon they don't go, whatever technology may be available. I can no longer fly London to New York at Mach 2, but Concorde allegedly did that from the 1970s. Does the fact that it doesn't happen now make the earlier flights fake?

>>i believe the first lunar landing was a hoax , i'm not as sure about the next 5.<<

So what necessitated the first being a hoax if the others were not?

>>only a non thinking person would believe what were told about the moon landings.<<

While that may be true, we do not have to BELIEVE anything. There is a vast pile of material evidence that can be examined at will by anyone who wants to. I've done it for seven years now, and it all points to the moon landings being real. Those who point out anomalies like no stars, weird shadows, a waving flag and deadly radiation lack observational ability, critical though processes and basic understanding of science. It is conspicuous that the most outspoken proponents of the conspiracy theories are the ones who lack any relevant training in the appropriate fields. Where are the qualified engineers who design spacecraft who think the Apollo spacecraft could not work? Where are the physicists who think the radiation would be too high? Where are the professional photographic analysts who think the pictures are fake?

The evidence is huge and overwhelmingly in favour of Apollo being a real event, including the first landing. Go out and look for it, rather than just parroting the same tired old arguments.

Answer 2

i think money is the biggest problem that goverment doesnt like such a huge expense at most 50 billion dollar but it is nothing in the comparison of expenses in iraq and afghanestan but 40 years ago there was a cold war and a moody race with soviet so goverment payed its budget.but for landing on mars there is also technological problems.

Answer 3

We wont even be alive by then, this world is coming to an end :0) in my opinion

Answer 4

my goodness. so why do you think Nasa would have staged this whole thing?