Astronomy & Space - May 2007

1) Since the Moon has only one light source, the Sun, the shadows must be in line. But in this cases, it looks as if there are multiple light sources in moon, which is not possible.
2)The foreground of many images of the astronauts on the Moon are filled in with light, while the shadows remain absolutely black, again proving that there are multiple light sources.
3)The footprints left by the astronauts are proof that the Moon landings are fake.
This one is also essentially a two pronged argument. First, the Fox show charged that the LM engine was so powerful that the upper layer of dust should have been blown away around the LM, so there should not be any footprints. Others have charged that the footprints should not be there since in the absence of water as a bonding agent, they should not maintain coherent shapes and sharp outlines.

2007-05-11 23:18:08 · 13 answers · asked by abafna 3

2007-05-11 22:27:20 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

In the United States, NASA wanted to design a pen that could work well in outer space (because some pens can't write if they are tilted so the ink moves away from the writing point). They spent millions of dollars on research then ultimately designed such a pen.

Later, they learned that the Russians just used pencils instead.

2007-05-11 19:54:33 · 11 answers · asked by Master Strategist 4

Even at the time of war also is it useful to watch enimies movement

2007-05-11 19:38:44 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Moons orbit planets, planets orbit stars, so do stars orbit something else within their galaxy? Do galaxies orbit something we havent discovered yet? Where does it end?
My God ive just thought myself silly.

2007-05-11 18:44:04 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

i have to do this project for 8th grade science and i have to denow how the trebuchet demonstrates all newton's 3 laws.

2007-05-11 17:09:12 · 1 answers · asked by Britta A 1

Also, from a reference point such as earth, an object lets say a radio wave passes by the sun (the sun creates a large curvature in space) it bends and actually takes a finite more amount of time to come back its point of origin, has time actually slowed? I am scratching my head trying to grasp this concept please help, any corrections are appreciated.

2007-05-11 16:58:09 · 4 answers · asked by Nick B 2

2007-05-11 16:23:09 · 10 answers · asked by Derchin 6

i read it in a article and it made no sence to me.

2007-05-11 16:15:53 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-11 15:59:50 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-11 15:35:17 · 12 answers · asked by ibid 3

2007-05-11 15:21:53 · 7 answers · asked by Sammy 3

2007-05-11 15:14:45 · 6 answers · asked by harlyheart 1

Bothe galaxies are 2.6 million light-years apart now and will emerge as one a few billion years from now. But, when it does happen, what do you think will happen?

2007-05-11 15:08:56 · 9 answers · asked by ZORRO 3

1)the tiny building blocks of earth
it is 12 letters long, P_ _ _E_ES_ _A_

2)organisms that were among the earliest forms of life and were able to photosynthesize

5 letters, the first letter is the third letter of the above clue

thanks!

2007-05-11 14:56:15 · 6 answers · asked by rhcpafifan 3

2007-05-11 14:27:35 · 6 answers · asked by john m 1

2007-05-11 14:09:48 · 2 answers · asked by BRIAN 2

2007-05-11 14:00:30 · 14 answers · asked by BRIAN 2

2007-05-11 13:47:55 · 9 answers · asked by BRIAN 2

2007-05-11 13:33:44 · 5 answers · asked by ProLife Liberal 5

2007-05-11 13:15:25 · 9 answers · asked by max 4

I've heard variations from 2,000 to about 4,000 light years but I'd like it narrowed down a bit. I know the Andromeda galaxy can be seen on clear nights and it's at a distance of 2.5 milion light years but I mean individual stars.

Interestingly, when we look at such an object we are seeing it as it was 2.5 million years ago not as it is today. If something happened to the galaxy tomorrow, say it mysteriously vanished, people on earth would not know about it for over two million years.

2007-05-11 13:09:41 · 6 answers · asked by Ellesmere 3

Does anyone truly know how far away we are (intelligently) of actually seeing some of the technologies seen in "Star Trek"?? For example; warp drive, transporters, phasers, shields, tractor beams, etc...

2007-05-11 13:03:02 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Seconds, minutes, hours, years are all based on how long it takes the Earth to make one revolution on its axis or the time it takes to make one orbit of the sun. How would we communicate time to an extraterrestrial without reference to our own planet?

2007-05-11 12:40:01 · 9 answers · asked by Research_chemist 2

and as a side note, no, it is not page 41, so don't answer that please....lol

2007-05-11 12:24:12 · 19 answers · asked by -Nessa- 2

By basically launching all our nukes at the solar side of Venus, could we blow it into Mars's orbit? No I'm not planning anything, I was just bored and curious (dangerous combination).

2007-05-11 11:34:56 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-11 11:17:00 · 5 answers · asked by jbgolf1 1

2007-05-11 10:20:58 · 3 answers · asked by astronomy enthusiast 1

2007-05-11 09:53:57 · 6 answers · asked by lillihtpad 1

2007-05-11 09:18:42 · 18 answers · asked by Chris H 1