NASA launches also crashed when they started, in the 1950's, even with the german V2 ballistic missiles as model.Their current success builds on 60 years of experience, which most private ventures do not have. It is more cost-effective to simply pay NASA to do the launches than to invest humongous amounts of money to develop their own launch technology. These being said, most launches for the Space Station are done bythe russians, from Baikonur. The French also have many decades od experience in space launches from their base in French Guyana (near Brazil), although not with human crew, and more recently, Japan and China (China also with human crew)
There is also a problem of cost; NASA launches cost many.many millions of US dollars each; private ventures are forced to keep costs down, since their attempts are not paid from tax money.
These being said, private ventures (that is, without use of any facility from NASA or other similar space agency) also have successful launches (see Spaceship One). The equipment used by NASA for launches is in fact built by private companies (Boeing, Northrop-Grumann, etc.)
2007-05-11 13:43:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Daniel B 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Most private ventures do not crash and not all NASA launches succeed. The reliability is about the same in both NASA and private companies
2007-05-11 13:58:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think your question is quite right; I don't think "most" private spacecraft crash. However, it is reasonable that private ventures have a lower success rate than NASA projects for several reasons. First of all, private projects are rarely funded as well as NASA projects. Secondly, private projects are often highly experimental (almost all of the x-prize craft fall into this category), and naturally, the more experimental the craft, the higher the risk of failure.
2007-05-11 14:06:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well NASA has been working with making spacecrafts for many years. They have made mistakes and corrected it. They are also better trained than the private ones.
2007-05-11 13:59:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by suffa4eva 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
i think of that there is 0 probability that something will hit Christ if the rapture comes merely before the top of the international. as a ways by fact the trip is in contact - If the rapture comes and the area flight starts off on the comparable 2nd, perhaps the countless team will disappear and the countless floor team as nicely and there will be a scramble to cover the artwork they have been scheduled to do. although, the individuals of the team in the international would be so shaken by the form that it quite is complicated to get a grip on what they have been doing earlier it handed off. the different individuals interior the trip is additionally in a state of marvel whilst various of of the individuals of the team disappear and could grow to be disoriented and nervous. of direction the information media will write it off as area extraterrestrial beings coming and taking our human beings away by fact they easily does no longer admit to the Christian international view of the rapture, and perhaps they are going to be under the guideline of the Anti-Christ by then so that they actually won't opt to record issues as they are truthfully. i ought to envision greater yet that could desire to suffice. you would be greater nervous approximately what is going to take place to you and the different persons which would be left at the back of whilst Christ does are available case you have on no account won Christ as your Saviour and Lord. The Anti-Christ would be a sweetie pie on the beginning up yet he would be a tyrant after he suckers all and sundry in. EDIT: reality IS reality in spite of in case you like it OR no longer. it continuously AMAZES ME that folk ASK QUESTIONS THAT they do no longer choose the terrific suited answer FOR. i'm beginning off to have faith that many that ask questions in here have drain bamage. Get the element?!
2016-10-15 10:23:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋