I have been studying the theory of evolution for a few weeks now, and I am wondering what the legitimate proof against evolution actually is.
I understand that irreducible complexity is a big one (especially regarding flagellum), but i saw a video of a speech that Ken Miller, a prominent biologist, made where he disproved the irreducible complexity of the bacteria flagellum.
I also have heard arguements as to there being no intermediate species found in the fossil record. But after some research it seems that this is a false claim. ID proponents will never admit that a fossil is an intermediate species and will just say that it is just another creature that was designed.
So what else are proponents of ID considering flaws in evolution?
I have heard that it is impossible for new information to be created in the DNA. If this is true, it would seem to me to disprove evolution.
2007-11-12
05:06:11
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Gardner S
2
in
Biology