Why has is all of a sudden become the practice to clamp the cord immediately after birth, rather than wait for it to quit pulsating?
My feeling on this, is that by doing so you are robbing the baby of half of it's blood, which has been squeezed back in to the placenta when the baby passed through the birth canal.
Why are they not waiting until the cord stops pulsating so that the blood from the placenta can return to the baby??? Has the mindset changed to you think the placenta is robbing the baby of blood??? Or is there an ulterior motive here, about getting that cord blood for research purposes???
I just witnessed a baby almost die on Discovery health because they clamped the cord immediately after birth, harvested a pint, A PINT, of blood from the cord, and the baby went in to respiratory distress. I think they robbed that baby of his blood, and if they would have waited to clamp the cord, and allowed the blood to go back in to the baby, he would have been fine.
2007-12-15
03:54:32
·
3 answers
·
asked by
CSmom
5