Politics - 13 November 2007

She is in fact those things and More, Cuckhold, Murderer, liar, cheat, thief, and not fit to be a Senator or President.

2007-11-13 06:07:48 · 24 answers · asked by MY NAME MICHELLE I HATE AMERICA 5

I know I do. I don't like Hillary Clinton and won't vote for her because of her Republican light views on the war etc., but I'm getting tired of people commenting that she's a Communist or Socialist.

2007-11-13 06:00:20 · 40 answers · asked by Zardoz 7

2007-11-13 05:52:52 · 18 answers · asked by gaffdeal 2

http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070922_seven_cia_veterans_c.htm

Be a real American and read what these people are saying.

2007-11-13 05:52:22 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is a bipartisan issue. Greedy politicians are on both sides of the aisle.

Suppose you want to spend more money this month than your income. This situation is called a "budget deficit". So you borrow. The amount you borrowed (and now owe) is called your debt. You have to pay interest on your debt. If next month you don't have enough money to cover your spending (another deficit), you must borrow some more, and you'll still have to pay the interest on the loan. If you have a deficit every month, you keep borrowing and your debt grows. Soon the interest payment on your loan is bigger than any other item in your budget. Eventually, all you can do is pay the interest payment, and you don't have any money left over for anything else. This situation is known as bankruptcy.

Each year since 1969, Congress has spent more money than its income. The Treasury Department has to borrow money to meet Congress's appropriations. The total borrowed is more than $9,000,000,000,000 and growing.

2007-11-13 05:51:21 · 8 answers · asked by MrOrph 6

2007-11-13 05:50:55 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Saw Aunt Jamima Rice being interviewed and there was this seal on the back with the words: "Western White House.... Crawford, TX"

I think that's beyond ridiculous. Just because he doesn't like to work and spends half his presidency on vacation doesn't mean they have to call it the White House.

2007-11-13 05:50:24 · 4 answers · asked by Sock it to you 1

I think shes proof of unconditional love and eternal forgiveness?
Tell me what you think?

2007-11-13 05:46:56 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-13 05:40:46 · 52 answers · asked by cq1 1

I thought she cared about peace, but it seems like she only cares about power. Your thoughts?

2007-11-13 05:39:29 · 15 answers · asked by civil_av8r 7

Considering our wide open borders and the ease with which a terrorist attack could be launched, doesn't the obvious answer seem kind of odd?

2007-11-13 05:32:16 · 19 answers · asked by Yaakov 6

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

2007-11-13 05:27:08 · 19 answers · asked by Zardoz 7

Per the recent Yahoo jailed journalists and all the hoopla surrounding it, what's your take on it?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071113/ap_on_hi_te/yahoo_chinese_journalists

Your thoughts?

2007-11-13 05:26:20 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Feminists want equal pay and equal work for women.
They want a female president. They also fight for Title IX which requires public institutions to give equal access of sports and education to females. So if were equal why dont both of us have to sign up in selective service?

2007-11-13 05:25:52 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm referring to negative-based questions about Hillary Clinton. I think they help more than hurt her. Press is press - and she has her name going for her, whether it is repeated in a positive way or not. They're making her into this big star or something.
Not the best example...but look at Britney Spears. She's trashed in the media everywhere (maybe rightfully so) meanwhile she's #1 or #2 on Billboard when her new stuff came out. Or even when Kerry ran against George W. Everyone was busy talking about George whether it be good or bad and the limelight was taken from Kerry completely.

2007-11-13 05:25:08 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

"they chop off heads" is an arguement that gives you the high moral ground.

2007-11-13 05:22:40 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-13 05:22:14 · 6 answers · asked by t.cerpin 1

They think nothing of funding the war, but don't want to fund or take care of those forced to deal with the aftermath.

2007-11-13 05:19:43 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

When Muslims are totally anti-womans rights? What is wrong with these people taking both sides of the arguement all the time?

2007-11-13 05:18:09 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-13 05:18:09 · 2 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

i think it either 4 or 6 years but i'm not sure

2007-11-13 05:14:11 · 15 answers · asked by angelbaby101466 2

Or will she bring her divisiveness to DC for more of the same?

2007-11-13 05:12:12 · 24 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

I guess he had more important things to do, like pitching another war to his friends in Waco, Texas.

2007-11-13 05:11:22 · 19 answers · asked by Enigma 6

Bush has gotten real friendly with Musharraf, but doesn't he look like your everyday Castro in military uniform? Here comes Bhutto from exile from the Emirates and now she seems like a little tiny bastion of democracy. What will Bush do now? Especially since Pakistan is with the nukes and the Taliban in the backyard?

2007-11-13 05:10:25 · 13 answers · asked by boxjellÿ 5

Anybody who has studied his facial features on tv knows that they are much closer to those of an orangutan.

2007-11-13 05:10:20 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

If we did, wouldn't it send a message to the middle east that we are not at war against Muslims?

2007-11-13 05:05:53 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

"The notion of a rigid separation between church and state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers."

lol

"the secularists wage an ongoing war against religion, chipping away bit by bit at our nation’s Christian heritage. Christmas itself may soon be a casualty of that war."

it gets better

he sees school shootings, plane hijackings, and other such events as a result of prohibitions on self-defense.

oh god...

Paul introduced The Sanctity of Life Act of 2005, a bill that would have defined human life to begin at conception, and removed challenges to prohibitions on abortion from federal court jurisdiction.[123] In 2005, Paul introduced the We the People Act, which would have removed "any claim based upon the right of privacy, including any such claim related to any issue of ... reproduction" from the jurisdiction of federal courts.

/facepalm

2007-11-13 05:04:01 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-13 05:03:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-13 05:03:10 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-13 04:57:29 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous