Seven CIA Veterans Challenge 9/11 Commission Report?

Question

http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070922_seven_cia_veterans_c.htm

Be a real American and read what these people are saying.

Mayor Quimby you may not like the source but these are real CIA agents...are you afraid it will shatter your little world?

Read the article then comment...quit being stupid.

You people make me sick, you don't care about America, you only care about your god damn party.

Yes its true , I could not find this on any of the major news sites, but this is no surprise either, I mean where has the real news been the last 7 years anyways???? Perhaps sending anthrax to the major networks did the job of silencing the media.

Tensor Calculus...no they have not go to http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html and see for your self.

David L. Griscom, PhD – Research physicist, retired in 2001 from Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years service. Fellow of the American Physical Society. Fulbright-García Robles Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México in Mexico City (1997). Visiting professorships of research at the Universities of Paris and Saint-Etienne, France, and Tokyo Institute of Technology (2000 - 2003). Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona (2004 - 2005).
Personal blog 2/9/07: "David Ray Griffin has web-published a splendid, highly footnoted account of The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True: This scholarly work, rich in eyewitness accounts, includes 11 separate pieces of evidence that the World Trade Center towers 1, 2 [each 1300+ feet tall, 110 stories] and 7 were brought down by explosives. [Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and was not hit by an airplane.

Answer 1

Hopefully this will all be exposed after the Bush Cheney show leave office....... all those responsible should be brought to justice and NOT pardoned by the next president

It is the peoples right to know and have justice served

Answer 2

Most likely they got snookered by the outright lies that you find on the internet about 9/11 being an "inside job." However, what 7 CIA guys think is not relevent compared to all the published opinions of scientists & experts, which say it was not an inside job. I looked at the link about these guys. They are well known conspiracy advocates & written a lot on the subject. Some of these guys are making the same old incorrect scientific arguments about the collapse & the pentagon. Real scientists have already settled this debate.

Answer 3

What 7 CIA agents think doesn't really matter.

I assume that the other 5 or 10 or 20 thousand CIA agents think the official story is correct.

That's a lot of CIA agents believing the official story!!

Also, the opinion of CIA agents is not particularly important. We already have the opinion of Civil engineers & demolition experts. Every single published expert on earth has rejected the conspiracy science. It's really amazing.

("published" means "in a journal")
===========================
I visited your link. It contains NO references to even one single, real journal article

As I said, there is not one single, solitary JOURNAL article on the face of the earth that will publish the conspiracy nonsense.

Your link just has websites with conspiracy gibberish.

Anyone can post a "article" on the internet, about anything- astrology, Voodoo, psychics, etc.

However, to get published in a tehcnical or scientific journal requires real science & it undergoes peer-review

The simple truth is that the experts have rejected the conspiracy "science," utterly, completely, stunningly.
===========================
1. David L. Griscom, PhD has published no journal articles about 9/11. That must mean his article was already rejected or he knows his non-sense will never be accepted so he didn't submit anything for publication.

2. Therefore, Griscom's admiration of Griffin (a retired professor of philosopthy) is irrelevent. Also, Griffin has no scientific journal articles about 9/11.

3. The fact that WTC7 collapsed even though it wasn’t hit by the planes is not surprising.

Even though they were NOT hit by the jets, numerous buildings over a wide area were hit by debris from the collapsing towers and were destroyed.

This includes: The Marriott World Trade Center , 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center, and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church (which wasn’t even in the WTC complex). The Deutsche Bank Building was also outside the WTC complex & was massively damaged, and was declared a total loss in 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_attack#Damage

As for WTC 7:
According to NIST "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." See http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=5#wtc7

Answer 4

I googled this and could not find one reliable source. I too think the case should be re-opened and Sandy Berger should have to take the polygraph test he said he would take. He stole documents from the report, and should be arrested for treason.

Answer 5

I don't see anyone willing to believe theories like that even if George Bush himself admited them.

Answer 6

Don't believe everything you read. These are all people who have or will write books. Follow the money, bullshit even sells!

Answer 7

Yes, I see. A group of retired CIA people, (most retired in the early 1990s) think that they know something based on what they don't know....................

Brilliant!

Answer 8

They should challenge the report because the report is not complete thanks to Sandy Berger "Mr. Paper Drawers"

Answer 9

When it's published somewhere credible, I'll put more weight to it.

Answer 10

That is not a news site, it is an opinion site.