2007-11-13 05:03:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
My personal opinion has been to vote for the administration. I may be wrong, but I think the president only appears to make decisions. It is those in the back room who end up telling them what to say and do.
But from simply a figurehead perspective I think they're both good candidates. I'd give Hillary the leg up because she demonstrates this strongness and tough as nails persona that America needs during this difficult time in the world. She also comes across as quite professional and can at times be personal. Obama seems to be more personal but you need to be able to do both. He also doesn't come across as strong and knowledgeable. Obama is probably a nicer person on an individual level, but I think Hillary comes across as much more presidential.
I could be wrong - but this is just my two cents.
2007-11-13 05:11:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obama/Mark Warner- the former governor of Va. Obama is going to need an incredible style of help interior the south and Warner is an extremely commonplace southern Governor. He has remarkable administration credentials. and that i think Warner could be Catholic. So he might valuable in that regard. Warner is fiscally conservative. i do no longer know if Obama ought to get Warner to return out of retirement, yet he ought to do plenty worse than Warner. Mark Warner represents the course that i replaced into hoping the democratic social gathering replaced into heading. A fiscally conservative southern Governor is precisely what Obama is going to ought to have if he expects to win something interior the south. Clinton/Wesley Clark- The retired NATO commander who led the efforts in Bosnia. i think McCain is going to circulate with Lieberman.
2016-10-16 09:18:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama is a fresh face. His optimism is very appealing. Ron Paul brings fresh ideas and supports the US Constitution. I'd like to see a Biden/Obama ticket.
Hillary is a cookie cutter politician who brings the same eight years of garbage to the table. Hillary is by far the worst choice on the Dem ticket.
2007-11-13 05:08:02 · answer #3 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Both are horrendous candidates. Obama has no experience but neither does Clintoon. Hanging out in the Senate and doing nothing doesn't qualify you to be President.
2007-11-13 05:09:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Between the two, I would vote for Barrack.. but he doesn't have the experience.
Hillary lies everytime she opens her mouth.. so no.
2007-11-13 05:11:10 · answer #5 · answered by ♥♥The Queen Has Spoken♥♥ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. They represent the much-needed facelift for the government of a country that is NOT all old white men.
They'll initiate DIPLOMACY-based foreign policy, make healthcare affordable for everyone, and protect civil liberties, not to mention appoint justices who will think my uterus belongs to me.
2007-11-13 05:10:17 · answer #6 · answered by Elizabeth J 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
since they don't answer any questions...it's hard to say. does anyone know what they stand for? i can't vote for someone that can't answer questions in a debate. the only questions obama answers is from tyra banks...and hillary clouds up her answers by saying two different things!
2007-11-13 05:08:18 · answer #7 · answered by danno 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well, anybody is better than the numb-nuts we have now.
2007-11-13 05:17:03 · answer #8 · answered by nathan f 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
One doesn't believe in GOD
and the other thinks she is GOD
Do you think America will elect one of them? I don't
2007-11-13 05:07:56 · answer #9 · answered by Johnny 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I'll give you my detailed opinion. No.
2007-11-13 05:06:38 · answer #10 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋