Politics - 4 October 2007

He says by wearing an American Flag Pin on his suit he would be demonstrating support for the IRAQ war. I contend that this type of thinking, automatically disqualifies him from being a real contender for President. We have troops in combat, in harm's way. Wear it to honor them. One's love for your country should have nothing to do with disagreeing with an official policy. The American flag should be above politics or partisanship. Do you disagree?

2007-10-04 01:43:50 · 15 answers · asked by David B 3

if the general election is held on the 1st of november at least it will be all over and done with for the nex few years

i get so fed up with all the news going on about it and if they hold it soon then maybe the country will not have to put up with the lies that the government seems to be telling to help them win the election

what do you think


xxx vici

2007-10-04 01:43:09 · 14 answers · asked by vici 4

The British were able to rid themselves of war criminal Blair...

They were able to get the new Prime Minister Brown to see sense and start withdrawing his Troops....

What's the matter with us and our Political Systems???????

2007-10-04 01:42:11 · 6 answers · asked by Dream Realized 2

"Bush Vetoes Child Health Bill Privately"

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/04/washington/04bush.html?ex=1349150400&en=1f7f6d1076cced16&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

Should he get benefits?

2007-10-04 01:20:39 · 16 answers · asked by A Guy 7

http://www.talkers.com/main/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=17&Itemid=34

I just laugh when the bitter confused liberals resort to name calling when it comes to Rush. Go ahead and call him a "pill popper". We know who is having the last laugh.

BTW: If you are in the Military you can tune into Rush 5 days a week on Armed Forces Radio where he reaches 1 million service men/woman all over the world. There is no liberal host on this network.

2007-10-04 01:18:31 · 26 answers · asked by DANCER 2

2007-10-04 01:17:36 · 4 answers · asked by Duminos 2

2007-10-04 01:12:26 · 11 answers · asked by Duminos 2

Ron Paul favors: Protecting our borders; getting rid of the Gestapo, IRS; monetary reforms (doing away with fiat currency and the FED); getting us out of Iraq and taking care of our own country; and is a strong believer in the Constitution...So, what is it about him that is not good? --very anti Marxist!!

2007-10-04 01:08:16 · 8 answers · asked by kbraun3394 2

Yep the left is saying GW would rather spend Billions in Iraq then Increase the social medicine Agenda. I am saying that many of the Poor I know that accept hand outs drive better cars than many of the people I know, they go to better colleges and Have a Wii and an X Box for their Plasma TV's!

I am giving you the chance to List Items you think the "poor" would rather spend money on than pay for thier Own Childrens health coverage!

2007-10-04 01:07:30 · 18 answers · asked by ThorGirl 4

2007-10-04 01:04:27 · 4 answers · asked by Secret Squirrel 2

And is there something in a liberals shallow head that stops them from hearing what was actually said, when he called a liar who claimed he was an Iraq war vetern,who never served in Iraq, a phony soldier? What a great way to describe a liar, and thank you Rush for not apologizing to the minority far left loons!

2007-10-04 00:58:23 · 17 answers · asked by Me 6

2007-10-04 00:34:49 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

I find it frightening.

2007-10-04 00:30:35 · 20 answers · asked by charbatch 3

this sums up my views pretty good ( from: http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/015834.html )

"Although I am glad he did it, I am not excited about Bush's veto today of the expansion of the children's health insurance program (H.R. 976). He didn't veto the measure because it is a welfare program. He didn't veto the measure because it is an income transfer program. He didn't veto the measure because it is unconstitutional. And he didn't veto the measure because the federal government should not have anything to do with health care. He vetoed this bill because it was passed by a Democratic-controlled Congress. If the Republicans still controlled the Congress, he would have rubber-stamped it in a heartbeat. If you have any doubt just look at the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003--a Republican health care welfare scheme that Bush signed into law on December 8, 2003."

2007-10-04 00:30:01 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-04 00:26:03 · 8 answers · asked by Dawnita R 4

2007-10-04 00:20:26 · 13 answers · asked by Darrell 4

or would he make a better Lord of the Cyst.

2007-10-04 00:07:59 · 8 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6

Where does Hillary think the 2 billion dollars a year to come from if she plans on giving it to children born in the U.S.? Do you think there will be a Huge tax hike? Why not just invest it into something usefull like lower heath care costs?

2007-10-04 00:07:22 · 15 answers · asked by acot_anthonym 4

2007-10-04 00:02:54 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous