Politics - 7 July 2007

Liberator OR Occupier?

Or something else?

2007-07-07 11:03:35 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

The guy hasn't even thrown his hat in the ring, and there have been two big attack stories this week--abortion and watergate. Are they afraid he will take down Hillary?

2007-07-07 11:03:26 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

--Than all those people who call him "dummy"?
Will we have to change our rules about who is allowed to vote?

2007-07-07 10:56:18 · 13 answers · asked by big j 5

2007-07-07 10:55:13 · 8 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2

SOUNDS LIKE A MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRY.

2007-07-07 10:53:43 · 8 answers · asked by Gustavo CL 5

why? give alittle something to back up your claims!;-)

2007-07-07 10:50:11 · 3 answers · asked by dingoboy 1

for example osama hitler etc....

2007-07-07 10:46:54 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-07 10:45:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

WELL! That bad bad man! Who cares?...Really! We live in a whole different era.

2007-07-07 10:41:05 · 16 answers · asked by The prophet of DOOM 5

Was the dangers of DDT overly exaggerated or erroneous?

Thus exposing millions of people to malaria?

BTW...how many of you heard about this? (That dangers of DDT are erroneous)

2007-07-07 10:39:37 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

As these two tell conflicting stories...

2007-07-07 10:37:11 · 8 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

2007-07-07 10:35:39 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

I heard he got caught in the rain without an umbrella, kept looking up to see where the water was coming from, and nearly drowned.

2007-07-07 10:33:42 · 19 answers · asked by dcb30 2

February 8, 2007

A regular contributor to the Wall Street Journal says there is a huge divide between those who give to charity and those who don't.

Brooks says when he began his research, he expected to find proof that liberals are the more generous group in America. But his findings show that conservatives are more generous in every way -- from volunteering, to donating blood, to giving money.

For example, homes headed by a conservative gave 30 percent more money to charity in 2000 than liberal families. .

Brooks explains that, according to his research, a household headed by a conservative, on average, gives 30 percent more dollars to charity than does one headed by a liberal -- despite earning six percent less income. He finds that significant.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/02/conservatives_more_generous_th.php

2007-07-07 10:32:11 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

And before anyone names Gandhi or Luther King, keep in mind the main reason India was freed was because the UK was nearly bankrupt after WW2; and the main reason why Blacks were given civil rights in the USA was because the civil unrest had grown to unthinkable proportions.

Is war the only way to obtain rights?

2007-07-07 10:29:12 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-07 10:24:31 · 10 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

One is engineer so I guess the common denomninator is they were all muslims...sunni from what I have read. I just read sunnis in iraq killed over 100 shias in a truck bomb today at of all places a market.

2007-07-07 10:24:26 · 9 answers · asked by Steelhead 5

What do you think? Please explain why or why not.

2007-07-07 10:17:22 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why did Bush allow an election outcome to determine Rumsfeld's position?

2007-07-07 10:13:20 · 8 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

I will!

2007-07-07 10:11:01 · 11 answers · asked by Lindsey G 5

Your favorite candidate is in the single digits in the polls . Obviously and absolutely zero chance of winning. . . .. What do you do ?

Do You Vote For Your Candidate , Knowing Your Vote For Him/Her Won't Help Them Get Elected ?
OR
Do You Pick A Candidate That Most Closely Reflects Your Views And Try To Help That One Get Elected ?

And Why ?

For anyone who still chooses to vote for a candidate that has no chance , I really would like to see a good explanation for it . I mean you've got to take into consideration that your candidate is just not gonna win today and someone else will win . Wouldn't it then make much more sense to try and get your second choice elected ?

2007-07-07 10:06:33 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

1. numerous tax breaks for the rich,

2. continuous lies from bush and cheney and rumsfeld.

3. forcing democracy on a people who don't know or care what it is. all the while keeping an eye on that oil.

4. lack of leadership. using erroneous facts to make decisions, having no plans for iraq once the government there was overthrown.

5.playing at law and order, but commuting a sentence for his boy libby, saying the 250,000 dollar fine for libby was substantial. a quarter of a million for people of that economic class is like 20 dollars is to me. then blaming it on clinton saying that the ex-slimeball did worse.

6. using 9/11 as an excuse for reducing the liberties of millions of innocent people. using 9/11 to start a war that has killed many thousands of people while waving the flag patriotically and hoping that we will forget what he didn't do in rvn.


thanks gwb

2007-07-07 10:03:02 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Link of all involved: (PDF)
http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20070316173308-19288.pdf

2007-07-07 09:58:33 · 15 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

It's a long article. Skim it over, read what interests you, then answer this question. Did we invade Iraq for the oil and use Saddam as an excuse?
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2005/crudedesigns.htm#pumping
Take a look at this also. This is from day two of Operation Iraqi Freedom showing we had control of almost all of their oil and infrastructure.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraqi_freedom_d2.htm
Do you still think it was to liberate Iraq from Saddam or to liberate Iraq from its oil?

2007-07-07 09:49:23 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Are you unaware that our founding fathers believed government should only provide that which can not be provided by ourselves?

2007-07-07 09:46:46 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

What are your thoughts on the Illuminati? conspiracy theory or real organization? When do you think the Illuminati will completely take over the world?

2007-07-07 09:34:43 · 12 answers · asked by rk88 1

http://www.wnbc.com/politics/4063107/detail.html

2007-07-07 09:17:06 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean, most Americans are very confused who to pick out of the jokes running in 2008 because it is perhaps the worst choice of Presidential candidates in US history. But, more than half the nation says they will not vote for Hillary under any circumstance. If she were to win, however, it would probably guarantee a Republican dominated Congress in 2010 and a Republican Presidential landslide victory in 2012.

2007-07-07 09:16:41 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

If Musharraf is killed the possiblility of a takeover by muslim fanatics is very possible. If that happens, these people will control at least 50 nuke warheads. That would put us in a bad place big time. Realistically, what could we do about it?

2007-07-07 09:16:40 · 5 answers · asked by Noah H 7

just thought id ask!!

2007-07-07 09:00:09 · 11 answers · asked by boricua_lilly 3