Politics - 29 October 2006

I thin what is the army of USA

2006-10-29 17:00:33 · 7 answers · asked by Yopy 5

2006-10-29 16:20:13 · 20 answers · asked by 112-24-8709 2

Normally Natwar is a emotional person. It surprises me when he not come forward to media about her remarks. What will be the reason. He knows the kick backs of bofors . Does he wait for his turn ?

2006-10-29 16:02:00 · 6 answers · asked by adraya 2

the democrats 'block' aggressive action against Iran or N. Korea?

And we reach the point of no return with their aggressive nuclear programs?

Would they sell the nukes to a terrorist group? I'm not even gonna let you answer that one. Of course they will.

Personally, I'm concerned. I'm concerned that the dems might ask for soooooo much TALK, that we end up in a no win situation. And if that were to happen, just close your eyes, because it's over baby.

2006-10-29 15:40:14 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just like racism, sexism, homophobia, religion, war, and most of society's other ills. Do they actually think a dual party system equates with true democracy, especially with the laws, electoral college and pay-to-play SOP of today's governments?

2006-10-29 15:18:58 · 7 answers · asked by Damien104 3

If instead of donating to the party of your choosing the money was instead put into one account and evenly distribued amongs republicans democrats libertarians and the green party for all elections not just the presidency would this ensure politicians who vote for we the peoples best interest instead of voting to ensure they stay in office for as long as possible?

2006-10-29 15:14:59 · 9 answers · asked by Perplexed 7

2006-10-29 15:05:35 · 17 answers · asked by STUD MAGNET HEIDI 1

I use to be a hardcore democrat in high school. I thought we should go to a universal healthcare system, and most poor people were good hard working citizens that had a few bad breaks or didnt have many oppurtunities to get out of their situation. then i actually started working with medicaid people and realized +70% (i know im stereotyping, there are *some* people) of them are rotten, b!tchy people who do nothing with their lives and expect everything to be handed to them on silver platter. so then i became a libertarian....

2006-10-29 15:01:03 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-29 14:56:11 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

I know he's is termed out for President, But Im really not sure if he can run for Vice.

2006-10-29 14:41:28 · 15 answers · asked by IOU101 3

Describe Republican views and actions dealing with
1 - poverty
2 - crime
3 - taxes

Thanks :]

2006-10-29 14:37:40 · 17 answers · asked by m&ms 1

Why would someone vote for bush? He has manipulated and has cheated. No one wants to be associated with a liar or cheat so why him?

2006-10-29 14:36:21 · 18 answers · asked by Bernie 2

a lot more cry babies on the Left? Are what else?

2006-10-29 14:32:51 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

The 9/11 Commission, in a massive, comprehensive, bipartisan effort, investigated all aspects of 9/11, and came out with a series of specific recommendations to make america safer for the future.

Bush fought the creation of the Commission, stonewalled releasing information to it, refused to testify in front of it for months, said he would quickly implement it's recommendations, and has done little or nothing since.

This question is not about conspiracies, only about the recommendations.

I specifically want answers from republicans explaining why.

-

2006-10-29 14:23:21 · 15 answers · asked by notme 5

So are humans mostly herd animals who blindly follow their political party into dark allies?

2006-10-29 14:19:44 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Ok Im having a really hard time trying to figure out why anyone wanted that fool in office in the first place....and a second time was just more ridiculous than having him in office the first....but I do want to try to understand why people voted him in again.

2006-10-29 14:13:02 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-29 14:05:24 · 11 answers · asked by IOU101 3

2006-10-29 14:04:49 · 15 answers · asked by Oh Tami !! 2

Most Americans do not believe the Bush administration has gone too far in restricting civil liberties as part of the war on terror, a new CNN poll released Thursday suggests.

While 39 percent of the 1,013 poll respondents said the Bush administration has gone too far, 34 percent said they believe the administration has been about right on the restrictions, according to the Opinion Research Corp. survey. Another 25 percent said the administration has not gone far enough.

Asked whether Bush has more power than any other U.S. president, 65 percent of poll respondents said no. Thirty-three percent said yes.Seventy-two percent of poll respondents said they believe the size of the federal government has increased in the past four years. Twenty percent believe it has decreased, and 8 percent had no opinion.

The telephone poll was conducted October 20-22. The sampling error was plus or minus 3 percentage points for questions asked of the full sample and plus or minus 4.5 percentage points for questions asked of the half sample.

2006-10-29 13:59:45 · 11 answers · asked by big-brother 3

I was checking out of a motel. Turned on the news, and thought I was watching a rehersal or practice. Didn't take long to figure out the truth. Then. . .. . . the second plane hit. (silence)

I was in shock. .. . . ....were you?

2006-10-29 13:46:39 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

Are we hypocrites then ? Should we blame the citizens of this country who brought Bush to power or should we blame the Bush Admn. ?

2006-10-29 13:41:02 · 31 answers · asked by the_ron 1

The Army program is apparently monitoring nonmilitary sites. These sites are PUBLIC DOMAIN and are not owned by the government or the Army.

"It's impossible to determine when something crosses the line from not a violation to a violation. It's like trying to define what pornography is or bad taste in music," said Spc. Jason Hartley, 32, who says he was demoted from sergeant and fined for posting a blog he created while deployed to Iraq with the New York Army National Guard.

Does this cross the line, or is it purely in the interest of national security?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061029/ap_on_hi_te/military_blogging

2006-10-29 13:35:02 · 16 answers · asked by big-brother 3

2006-10-29 13:34:58 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

we don't want him ! he was born in the North... Conn.

2006-10-29 13:34:40 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Isn't that the bottom line? I mean, not in every case, don't start throwing exceptions at me as I'm sure there are thousands. But really, doesn't it all boil down to that? God or no God?

2006-10-29 13:34:12 · 21 answers · asked by ben_j_mac 2

2006-10-29 13:27:47 · 24 answers · asked by the_ron 1

Which party do you think sticks its nose in other countries personal buissness more?

2006-10-29 13:16:18 · 20 answers · asked by Star 4

people, . .. . . .. .How did that make YOU feel?
Have you forgotten?

More importantly. . ..Do you 'need' them to remind you?

2006-10-29 13:07:32 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

It appears that all countries fear US and by this they can change the world opinion as they like whether it right or wrong.

2006-10-29 13:06:46 · 26 answers · asked by bhattathiry 1

2006-10-29 13:04:56 · 16 answers · asked by   6