So are humans mostly herd animals who blindly follow their political party into dark allies?
2006-10-29 14:19:44 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Its worse than that.
2006-10-29 14:22:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Republic-ant's is funnier since humor is based on the reality of a situation and, obviously, the republicans-can't, but the democrats are smarter than their re-can't contemporaries so the epithet does not have a grasp of the reality of the situation and misses it's mark. Now crud, well, that word is too ambiguous and could have a number of meaning's so with out a solid base in reality for it's prefix, it misses the satirical mark, as well.
2nd part of question....Yes..humans are herd animals...Humans expect to much from humans...come on....we are just animals...MOOOOO!
2006-10-31 08:41:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neither! There is nothing funny about party affiiation!
We all need to vote for the best qualified person, regardless of party!!! Only idiots and morons would vote a straight party ticket.
IMHO,
The Ol' Sasquatch Ã
Peace!
2006-10-29 22:31:27 · answer #3 · answered by Ol' Sasquatch 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Just the Repukes.
2006-10-29 22:22:02 · answer #4 · answered by Active Denial System™ 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I find nothing funny about the repuglicants
2006-10-29 22:22:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Neither.
2006-10-29 22:22:49 · answer #6 · answered by Jean R 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's a tie! They are both equally funny.
2006-10-29 22:26:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Your question may be yanked, they did one of mine like this.
2006-10-29 22:29:07 · answer #8 · answered by mikey 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
chimpboy! repukes! repugsnants!
2006-10-29 23:02:05 · answer #9 · answered by impeachgwb 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
dumocruds, never heard that one, so it is much funnier
2006-10-29 22:22:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋