the democrats 'block' aggressive action against Iran or N. Korea?
And we reach the point of no return with their aggressive nuclear programs?
Would they sell the nukes to a terrorist group? I'm not even gonna let you answer that one. Of course they will.
Personally, I'm concerned. I'm concerned that the dems might ask for soooooo much TALK, that we end up in a no win situation. And if that were to happen, just close your eyes, because it's over baby.
2006-10-29
15:40:14
·
23 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Morey - Quite honestly, I really hope you SEE this. North Korea was in violation of that agreement from the BEGINNING. My God...You can type, you can use the internet, you speak well in writing, but...WHAT ABOUT THINKING??
I know you can read...
SIR, N.Korea broke that agreement before the ink was dry. Everyone knows that. Even your hero, Bill Clinton knows that and has admitted it.
2006-10-29
15:58:23 ·
update #1
Yep. You're right. Under the Clinton admin. they talked and talked and N. Korea just delayed and delayed. Now they have nukes that can reach the West Coast of the U.S. So much for diplomacy and dialogue. Lets kick some N. Korean a s s before they nuke us.
2006-10-29 15:43:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by afreeman20035252 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
Anyone can come up with a thousand scenarios about what might happen if....... You could do that all day and probably never come up with the one that would actually happen. Many of these are scare tactics of the party that would like your vote and always about what will happen if you vote for the opposing party. It's all BS. Nobody can predict the future and if you don't believe what is happening now is the correct action to take, try something different because if you vote the ones in causing the problem, how do you feel it will ever be fixed? Life is full of chances and sometimes that is all the choice we have.
2006-10-29 15:47:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
These people building a nuclear arsonal are doing it because they are afraid of US. If we calm down, they will likely do the same...the more aggressive and war like we become, the more they will build to protect themselves against the number 1 manufacturer of WMD.
However, now they will never disarm because of our aggressive administration and they never know when such an individual will be elected into office again.
We try to teach children in elementary school the difference between assertiveness and aggression...I don't think Bush ever got through the sixth grade on that one. One aggressive bully begats another. A wise man knows how to get what he wants without striking back. King George just isn't wise.
2006-10-29 15:46:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Under the Clinton administration, we had a deal with North Korea. We'd guarantee that they would be supplied sufficient heating oil, and not threaten them militarily, and they wouldn't develop nuclear power/weapons. It was working. When Bush got in office, he cancelled the oil and labeled them a member of the 'axis of evil', which to NK was considered a military threat.
We backed out of the deal, they didn't. So, their response was to be expected. And- I'd say that it was more than just understandable, but quite intentional by the Bush administration. The oldest trick in the book to staying in power is to create enemies. So, in his first State of the Union address, he defined his enemies and went on course.
NK wasn't a threat to us in any way. We made them a threat. Thanks Bush- another wonderful foreign policy move.
So- if you're 'concerned' about what the dems will do, then you've responded to the fear that the GOP intentionally created... just so that you'd respond emotionally like you did.
Do you feel like a pawn? You've been played.
sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
2006-10-29 15:47:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Morey000 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
what is the point of no return? them detonating a nuke in America?
he's blowing them up now and can give them away now... what point of no return do you Republicans want?
but could we take any real action if we wanted to? no, because we are tied up in Iraq... we're not even sure we know where they are making their bombs in the miles of underground bunkers they are said to have... so we would pretty much have to put troops on the ground to do any good...
All Bush does is talk, because that's the only thing we're able to do... we could bomb where we think they are... but if we don't really know.. .it's just pissing them off and wasting bombs...
N. Korea is and WAS TEN TIMES THE THREAT Saddam ever was... but it's a good thing we went to Iraq first... and got tied up there...
I think we passed the point of no return about a month ago when they detonated one...and there have been no Republican actions
2006-10-29 17:05:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Blocking any military/aggressive action will show weakness!!The 9/11 attacks happened due to the same weakness of the previous administration!! Let us hope that never happens and that our country will stand together against the enemies of America!!!
2006-10-29 15:47:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Maybe the democraps could plan on trading such weapons for any hostages in Afghan or Iraq....no wait, then they'd be just like the repukelicans...corrupt elitist POS....(just like they are!!)
There's no difference in either, so we need to cleanse our government of BOTH. Elect real representatives, not elitist, wealthy opportunists. One does not need an Ivy League education, nor the stench of "experience" in the Federal Gov't. We need smart, Americans of average means who know what REAL LIFE is like.
2006-10-29 15:51:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Damien104 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Probably the same thing that happens if the Republo-fascists keep the military so tied up in wars of conquest that they're utterly incapable of reacting to any actual threat. Like what's going on now.
2006-10-29 15:58:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hate Boy! 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
We better find some spines. All I can say.
MOREY: Clinton first labeled the "axis of evil" in his 1996 Innaugural speech.
2006-10-29 15:48:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
You must have toooooo much time on your hands. You worry too much! Unless you are "high ranking" military, there is not much you personally can do about this situation. We vote these persons in hoping the person we vote for represents our thoughts and feelings. That is why VOTING IS SO IMPORTANT!
Old enough? VOTE!!
2006-10-29 15:45:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rodeored 2
·
1⤊
2⤋