Politics - 16 October 2006

resume, calling herself a Russian expert to get the job of Sect of State. President Putin has called Condi completely illiterate in Russian. She has even been accused of purchasing her own papers for college to obtain her Doctorate. It's a fact! She can't read or write in Russian. Putin was offended by Condi and asked her not to come back to Russia. Why does this not bother Bush
when his Sect of State lies blatantly? PS She can't speak Spanish at all either and that's on her resume too.. What's wrong with Bush why doesn't he care about her incompetency and blatant lying?

2006-10-16 05:24:55 · 8 answers · asked by Jennifer T 1

http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/uploads/zionist_sharon_monkey_and_baby_bush.jpgb8pkvi.jpg

2006-10-16 05:20:12 · 26 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 5

i think that women should have a chioce to do with her body. however i also beleive that fetuses shouldnt be aborted whenever theres a mistake. but for those of you who are pro life: what if the woman was raped? or a victim of incest? what if there were complications in which if the mother gave birth the mother would die and in turn the baby? these are the only circumstances in which i think that a person should be allowed an abortion. and for those of you who say what if the woman gets accidently pregnant and she wasnt ready, i beleive that in that case she should try to raise it or give it up for adoption and give it the chance for a better life. also a fetus should not be killed just cause you couldnt keep it in your pants or wear a condom. what are your views on it?

2006-10-16 05:15:55 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-16 05:10:03 · 17 answers · asked by buffman316 2

2006-10-16 05:00:29 · 23 answers · asked by Shiraz the truth detector 2

United States North Korea

S. Korea China
Japan Russia
UK France
Australia Iran
Israel Venazuela
Could we really be in for a a s s whooping

2006-10-16 05:00:18 · 6 answers · asked by ADAM 1

i think that democrats are pushovers and bcsically tree hugging hippies. republicans are ignorant stuck up snobs that are only out to benefit themselves. i mean realy they are so ignorant that there is no point in naming how because they will deny it and probably come up with a stupid reason for it. in my opinion democrats are the lesser of two evils, thats why i vote democrat. i think that you need a healthy balance between the two, both are so extreme for what they beleive in that either way we probably wont benefit from 1 alone. you cant win with a one sided mentality. THEY ARE BOTH RETARDED

2006-10-16 04:59:38 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-16 04:56:34 · 17 answers · asked by ~XYZ 1

2006-10-16 04:47:35 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-16 04:46:17 · 6 answers · asked by Shiraz the truth detector 2

We say that the "buck stops w/ the President; but doesn't at least part of that "buck" stop w/ the Democratic Senators who voted for the war?
If we allow the excuse that the Senators were lied to, then shouldn't we allow that excuse to Bush who was also lied to by our intelligence agency?
Where is it written that the "buck stops" only w/ the president?

2006-10-16 04:42:49 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-16 04:42:41 · 7 answers · asked by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5

2006-10-16 04:41:22 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Like how about we tell the Iraqi people we are leaving in a year (or whenever) and they have to get it in gear by then? We do the same with our citizens on welfare and it has been working out well. If for some reason they can't get it together by then, we will review their case and see if they qualify for an extension, based on objective criteria. What do you think?

2006-10-16 04:39:39 · 6 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

Hell No, after Nov. '06.

I can't see him travelling the world as an elder Statesman, because that takes Kudos and Brainpower.

I can't see him being involved in any Peace negotiations as he used his entire tenure fighting wars.

I can't see him giving lectures in the world's top Universities as you need credibility as a World Leader..

What is he going to do?? Advisor to Halliburton and the Military Industrial complexes??????

2006-10-16 04:38:25 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

if George W. Bush were a muslim, would liberals support him? would liberals become republicans and support the war and everything, since iraq was a secular nation?

2006-10-16 04:37:30 · 7 answers · asked by kunta kinte 2

Is it a huge mistake to allow so many Muslims into this country?

2006-10-16 04:37:24 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-16 04:35:58 · 2 answers · asked by Mufaddal M 1

Democrats are always complaining about a timeline in Iraq to made known. Why can't liberals just let the military handle Iraq and Afghanistan intead of trying to be war time advisors?

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/19/iraq.pullout/index.html

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061016/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iraq

2006-10-16 04:33:17 · 19 answers · asked by buffman316 2

2006-10-16 04:31:42 · 14 answers · asked by Shiraz the truth detector 2

2006-10-16 04:30:06 · 17 answers · asked by Shiraz the truth detector 2

What did you think?

2006-10-16 04:28:10 · 1 answers · asked by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5

why does the Left fight Christianity more than it fights islam? Christianity may not be 100% tolerant of all the Left's practices, but islam is far farther down the right side than Christianity is. if george bush, your worst enemy, was a muslim, what would you think about islam? many people say that hate islam, but islam is more accepted than Christianity is, even with all the violence that muslims are committing. why? will the Left stand up to islam when the Christians are gone?

2006-10-16 04:20:43 · 12 answers · asked by kunta kinte 2

he's the president for christ's sake!

s. korea's aosc is 13. ban ki-moon should
be executed. not allowed to rule the world.

2006-10-16 04:18:42 · 7 answers · asked by redreverser 1

2006-10-16 04:12:59 · 18 answers · asked by Shiraz the truth detector 2

2006-10-16 04:11:43 · 8 answers · asked by Shiraz the truth detector 2

I have a view on this as I see the answers posted here on Y. Answers. With Fox claiming to have a greater coverage than any other Media source does that tell you anything?

2006-10-16 04:09:08 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

You remember conservatives? They believe in smaller government, restricted spending, and limited involvement in people's personal lives? Will republicans finally get back to conservatism?

2006-10-16 04:03:56 · 16 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

A preset media world ready for people to eat. Fox fair and balanced. Your world today. The truth. The best coverage. All you want to hear.

Where are the Iraqi children with their brains blown out? Or limbs missing and thrown across the street. The stories of peaceful protesters gunned down. Families shattered. Minds overflowing. Morgues overflowing. Little of it of consequence to a country educated not to answer to 'cockroach nations"

What is the truth and facts to a sheeple that won't even look at the world. But bray on desperately about their morals and ethics. Lesser of evils. Their own reality made for them.

2006-10-16 03:58:39 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-16 03:56:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous