English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

he's the president for christ's sake!

s. korea's aosc is 13. ban ki-moon should
be executed. not allowed to rule the world.

2006-10-16 04:18:42 · 7 answers · asked by redreverser 1 in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

If you are referring to the age of sexual consent, he can not raise the age because he has no freaking business telling the states what to do. Hes not a god damn dictator as much as he would like to be.
Teenagers have sex.Shocking!

2006-10-16 04:25:51 · answer #1 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 1 0

You are a spatz foley.
Go away GOP-predators of children.

Is Bush into this also--well no surprise in GOP.

Why have an age limit at all.

fags like foley and ohers don't like at id's. Its youth that turns em on.

BUSH can't keep his paws off condo rice and you want to do something about legal sex age.

well I wish he had a plan for Presidential duties. He's clueless.

His mouth and admininstration has done enough.
Better hope he can lame duck this next two years without getting impeached.

2006-10-16 11:33:27 · answer #2 · answered by cork 7 · 0 0

AoSC is a state law, not a federal law.

Perhaps we need a test about government before allowing anybody to vote. It would prevent a lot of the idiocy we have in government today.

2006-10-16 11:48:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm thinking "age of sexual consent" but it makes as much sense as South Korea ruling the world.

2006-10-16 11:26:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's up to each State,the Feds. are in to much of the states business as it is.

2006-10-16 11:35:57 · answer #5 · answered by kman1830 5 · 0 0

I guess I am a dumb *ss, but what does "aosc" stand for?

2006-10-16 11:21:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm with as400, have no idea what you are talking about.

2006-10-16 11:25:13 · answer #7 · answered by Meow the cat 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers