Politics - 4 October 2006

You get "PRICK: THAT DENY EVIDENCE"

2006-10-04 07:37:12 · 7 answers · asked by Cheryl 2

10 qualities befitting of a president if you are for him.

10 reasons why he shouldn't be president if you are against him.

2006-10-04 07:35:34 · 9 answers · asked by adrixia 4

And make Haliburton more profitable

2006-10-04 07:34:00 · 13 answers · asked by Cheryl 2

2006-10-04 07:26:44 · 12 answers · asked by hello1234 1

Was there a political agenda to his assassination?
Did Lee Harvey Oswald kill John Kennedy by himself, or did a conspiracy do it?
Who gained from it?

2006-10-04 07:18:43 · 31 answers · asked by Andy H 3

First graph says, "top 5 percent" of wage earners pay 53.25% of the taxes. He uses the misleading "top 5 percent" and pretends it means people who earned 5% of the money are paying 53.25% of the taxes. The funny part: watch the income curve of the three graphs. The first has the top 5% paying 53% of the taxes because they earn about that percent of the money, which he leaves out. Notice that when he goes onto the "top 10% of wage earners" and the total percent of tax paid barely changes, just to 64.89%, he is showing that it really is just a handful of millionaires at the top who make all the money - the first 5% had to pay 53% of the taxes because they made about that percent of the money, while the poor second 5% - the people who he adds to make his second chart - only change things by about 11%. As anyone knows, this is because they only make about 11% of the money. Look how fast income earned drops off: first 5% make about 50% of money, next 5% make about 10%. Brilliant lies!

2006-10-04 07:15:39 · 18 answers · asked by notme 5

I used to think Colin Powell did, but even he blatantly lied to the UN.

2006-10-04 07:14:42 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

What's the difference between a republican & a democrat? Where do they stand on issues?

2006-10-04 07:13:44 · 17 answers · asked by JJJJJ 3

To point fingers, play the blame game or bringing Foley to justice?

2006-10-04 07:10:25 · 15 answers · asked by Sleazy P. Martini 1

It seems like no matter what you're for and against, there's always someone telling you how WRONG your OPINIONS are.

2006-10-04 07:10:03 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

The signs are going to say "Your Daughters Are Burning In Hell." Liberals disgust me everyday! Why do they do this! They have even protested at military soldiers' funerals with signs that say "Thank God Soldiers Are Dead."

I have one thing to say, F*#+ Them!!!

2006-10-04 07:09:48 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think he is aware?

2006-10-04 07:06:10 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Karl Rove has already told some conservative insiders that there WILL be a October Surprise in order to influence the upcoming election. (see link below). Gary Hart (former Senator) believes that one possibility is an attack on Iran's nuclear program, and possibly a broader attack aimed at regime change.

I think that it will be something that hits home much harder....like actually showing Osama's dead corpse on national TV. (although maybe they'll save that for 2008).

What do YOU think the Republican October surprise will be?
Will you be influenced by it -- or have you pretty much already made up your mind, irregardless of an October Surprise by EITHER party?

Here's the link in case you think I'm making this up about Rove already stating that there will be an October Surprise:

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/9/20/141615.shtml?s=lh

2006-10-04 07:02:35 · 9 answers · asked by captain2man 3

Most Iraqis Favor Immediate U.S. Pullout, Polls Show

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/26/AR2006092601721_pf.html

2006-10-04 07:01:51 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.sweetjesusihatebilloreilly.com/images/Oreilly_Foley.jpg

2006-10-04 06:55:11 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Not that it will make a heck of a difference... we are already wise to those tricks.... right?

2006-10-04 06:51:57 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I read in the paper the other day about those"Gun-advocates" are meeting to discuss..bla, bla, bla....

It really struck me that the media calls those who stand up for their 2nd admendment rights are called "Advocates" as if they are trying to change the current laws or to advocate something. Shouldn't they be called "Constitutional Believers" and the people that want to change the constitution be called the "Advocates to Change the Constitution for a more left-wing-liberal styled world"

your thoughts please!

2006-10-04 06:51:43 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Here are 7 of 36

Republican executive Randall Casseday of the conservative Washington Times newspaper was arrested for soliciting sex from a 13-year old girl on the internet.

Republican chairman of the Oregon Christian Coalition Lou Beres confessed to molesting a 13-year old girl.

Republican County Constable Larry Dale Floyd was arrested on suspicion of soliciting sex with an 8-year old girl. Floyd has repeatedly won elections for Denton County, Texas, constable.

Republican judge Mark Pazuhanich pleaded no contest to fondling a 10-year old girl and was sentenced to 10 years probation.

Republican Party leader Bobby Stumbo was arrested for having sex with a 5-year old boy.

Republican petition drive manager Tom Randall pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 14, one of them the daughter of an associate in the petition business.

Republican County Chairman Armando Tebano was arrested for sexually molesting a 14-year-old girl.

2006-10-04 06:50:27 · 14 answers · asked by Sticky 2

There's no doubt that Bush is the Antichrist that the bible speaks of. Shouldn't we true Americans send him & his followers to Iraq?

2006-10-04 06:49:03 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

click the pictures.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1584592/posts

2006-10-04 06:45:55 · 6 answers · asked by Tommy G. 5

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061004/ap_on_go_co/congress_pages_36
He clearly knew it was going on. I don't buy the 'I didn't know excuse' for one minute (everybody knows everybody's business in Washington). Trying to blame Democrats for leaking the emails is the biggest copout since 'I did not have sex with that woman'. ABC sited the page as the source anyway. Why not just fess up that he tried to cover it up and resign with some grace.




******Answering with something that Barney Frank, Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton or any other Democrat allegedly did 10 years ago, or yesterday for that matter, IS NOT an answer. It's a DODGE so if that's the best you can do, don't bother.

2006-10-04 06:40:13 · 7 answers · asked by Balaam's Talking Donkey 3

http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/images/chart0905_3.gif

http://www.uuforum.org/deficit.htm

http://thinkprogress.org/iraq-timeline

2006-10-04 06:35:46 · 7 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

Should I buy stock in companies that make guns?

2006-10-04 06:34:35 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-04 06:30:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

You have to get to the last paragraph to find it.

2006-10-04 06:28:35 · 7 answers · asked by Tommy G. 5

Should voting be COMPULSORY ?
Or there is no essence left in politicians ?

2006-10-04 06:26:53 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

it's all going to come out and they'll be in prison...what'll you say when asked why you voted for bush?

2006-10-04 06:24:08 · 25 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

2006-10-04 06:16:46 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Republicans constantly whine about the democrats increasing government spending and yet recent democrats have had surplus's while the republicans always put us in debt. Why is that?

2006-10-04 06:15:35 · 10 answers · asked by Nick F 6

..under Reagan provided more than a decade of prosperity?

They were scrambling to come up with some theories about how it was coincedence and the real reason for the good economy was blah, blah, blah.

2006-10-04 06:11:48 · 26 answers · asked by El Pistolero Negra 5