http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061004/ap_on_go_co/congress_pages_36
He clearly knew it was going on. I don't buy the 'I didn't know excuse' for one minute (everybody knows everybody's business in Washington). Trying to blame Democrats for leaking the emails is the biggest copout since 'I did not have sex with that woman'. ABC sited the page as the source anyway. Why not just fess up that he tried to cover it up and resign with some grace.
******Answering with something that Barney Frank, Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton or any other Democrat allegedly did 10 years ago, or yesterday for that matter, IS NOT an answer. It's a DODGE so if that's the best you can do, don't bother.
2006-10-04 06:40:13 · 7 answers · asked by Balaam's Talking Donkey 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, he blocked the investigation you idoit.
2006-10-04 06:45:23 · update #1
He should be arrested for impeding the investigation and suppressing evidence. Everyone involved with the cover up should be thrown out of office. Hastert above all the others had the legal obligation to investigate this matter and chose not too. Yes, he should resign but he won't.
2006-10-04 10:23:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good Lord! Hassert has already volunteered some of the best minds in the world to look into this and that fact has just frankly been as ignored as yesterday's Ann Coulter underwear!
He said he would set Alberto Gonzalez PLUS Jeb Bush onto the trail of seeing what really happened between Foley and his multiple molestation attempts. If Gonzalez and Bush and maybe even Katherine Harris nee Coulter were really assigned to get to the bottoms of all this, I think this little fiasco would disappear faster than a fetching apricot boa at a Filinne's Basement sale!
2006-10-04 14:13:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First, Hastert did no longer understand approximately "pedophile habit" for 3 years. He did no longer understand approximately "salacious pc messages" for 3 years. What he DID understand approximately replace into an digital mail asking a former web site, WHO replace into 18 on the time, for a image and what he needed for Christmas, for 3 years. He in basic terms knew approximately it through fact the mum and dad asked Hastert to tell Foley to stop emailing the former web site. i think of the suitable question could be, which democratic staffer knew bearing directly to the prompt messages and salacious emails and withheld that guidance till it replace into maximum politically efficient to launch it to the clicking. It replace into the salacious prompt messages and emails that have been released with the aid of some nameless democratic staffer to the clicking. and that they knew approximately it considering that April.
2016-12-08 08:21:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Greetings!
Actually he should be criminally charged for aiding and abetting. Who knows maybe even conspiracy. Years ago you would hear this happening in the congress at least once every two years or so . Suddenly you very here this is going on. Surely it did not stop. These people take enamored kids and do them. Some willing some not.
Good Luck
2006-10-04 06:46:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes and i recommend real criminal punishment...you know the kind you or i would get, not the country club prison!
2006-10-04 06:43:48 · answer #5 · answered by lifetimefamily 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
He saw the first emails that transpired and there were no sexual conotations, he had it investigated and they told Foley NOT TO EMAIL PAGES ANYMORE
So the moron that Foley is, started Instant Messaging
There was no freaking cover-up.
2006-10-04 06:43:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
He should resign and if not, be removed. No Question!!
2006-10-04 06:53:28 · answer #7 · answered by culpstir 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋