it's all going to come out and they'll be in prison...what'll you say when asked why you voted for bush?
2006-10-04 06:24:08 · 25 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nobody really did these last two elections, so the statement would be the truth for most of America.
2006-10-07 23:43:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am extremely proud of the fact that I did NOT vote for
John "I HATE the US Military" Kerry.
History will show that Bush-43's pre-emptive strike against terrorism, (Finally facing up to the enemy and going on the attack!) was the correct thing to do. Remember President Truman and his situation, reviled by the US electorate, but revered in history.
All one has to do is read Victor Davis Hanson (The Polyponesian Wars) to realize that any AFFLUENT society will lose any war they enter because; Why would any parent, who have sacrificed financially to see their USC, (or UF, UI, Suny, pick your University...) graduate - VOLUNTEER for military service to possibly die fighting Islamic rock farmers and camel jockeys in a far off land? WHO could blame them?
Selfish though they may be...
There were terrorist attacks against Americans, on average every 18 months during the Clinton admin, and not once SINCE 9/11!
And dozens have been "pre-empted!"
I have taken myself out of the Best Response vote BECAUSE your ignorance of "The Bigger Picture" has to be revealed.
My guess? In ten years you won't admit to anyone that you were so insipid, so "UNAWARE!" a decade earlier...
2006-10-04 06:52:47 · answer #2 · answered by Number1son 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If by Gods grace I am still around in ten years, I will admit voting for President Bush.
2006-10-04 06:28:09 · answer #3 · answered by loufedalis 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
THANK YOU! Every time one of you liberal Bush-haters start ranting outrageous lies and creating preposterous conspiracy theories, it only goes to reinforce my point that most that oppose Bush are unable to justify their position or to engage in any intelligent debate on the issues.
If someone brought up the financial investment of supporting the war in Iraq, well then, there would be a debate worth having and both sides could bring up some points for all to consider! But claiming Bush alone got us in this war to profit from oil is so ludicrous, it offers nothing to the intellectual debate.
Your insistence on relying on pure fabrication demonstrates your desperation and discredits those that may oppose the Bush initiatives for legitimate reason. For that, I thank you, as it only bolsters our conservative opinions that Bush is on the right track in combating terrorism and striving to bring about democracy to the world!
By the way, I predict that sometime within this century, President Bush will be heralded as one of the greatest leaders of our time bringing about democracy to those that would have not had the chance of such without him!
2006-10-04 06:33:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Gonna be in prison???
First this statement doesn't even rise to the level of reasonable speculation on the 43rd president's future.
Second, if you know ANYTHING about politics not just in the US but anywhere world wide, you'd know that as time passes politcians look better, even the criminal ones look less bad as time goes on and memories of their lowlights fade!
Succesfuly or not George W. Bush would be seen as a man with good intentions a man who followed in the footsteps of one of America's greatest Chief Executives and that is Ronald Reagan. As time passes on people will remember Reagon more for his stance atop the rubble of the WTC with bullhorn in hand, the picture which defined his presidency and less for the tough days in Iraq.
In anyevent he is a two termer and history tends to view two term presidents in better lights than those who only won one!
2006-10-04 06:31:07 · answer #5 · answered by Masterwooten 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
In ten years, all that will be known is that some wimp from one party pardoned a criminal from another. Part of the perks package of being a President of the United States is not having to say your sorry....er...free pardons for anything and everything you did naughty-like while you were in office.
That is why, as much they shout about him being evil, no Republican will actually 'go after' Clinton. It is a rule of protocol.
For me, my conscience is clear. I voted for Perot, BOTH Times he ran. I have voted for Green Party ever since. I freely admit I have voted for Ralph Nader, too.
Vote Third Party! Make Lobbyists pay through the nose for your vote!
If you are ever inclined to vote 'lesser of two evils', vote third party. If you know anyone who plans not to vote, tell them to get off their tushy and vote third party and make the US Regime think twice about mocking our ability to enact change.
Point of Order here!
Bush Jr. has sold US out. Noone even remotely skilled in economics could ever say what he's done to this country is a good thing. Clinton turned over what...1..2 trillion in surplus? And now Bush Jr. has us 8 Trillion in debt?
That's $8,000,000,000,000.00+ in debt. Or..should it be 10...?
C'Mon! Really! How can anyone say this shill is an economic genius? The rich have gotten a lot richer. And, there are more poor and less middle class now since he has been in office.
He's encouraged outsourcing of high paying tech jobs and encouraged illegal immigration to take the jobs we'd work while on unemployment.
Grrr!
2006-10-04 06:33:42 · answer #6 · answered by Quinton1969 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Absolutely! He is protecting our country, not loke Clinton who would let anyone bomb us - remember the USS Cole?Bush has turned around the economy (all time highs! I love it!) and has continued to give ALL of us tax breaks - yes, all of us. I am a middle income single mother, so I am NOT one of the rich, and I am reaping the benefit of his tax breaks that are not ONLY for the rich - educate yourself on that stuff!! Good lord!
and you democrats who are freaking out about Foley? Have you conveniently forgotten that in the 80s 2 of your democrats were CENSURED (left to serve, got reprimanded, hand slapped but kept their jobs) after they actually HAD SEX WITH their male pages (oh no, homosexuality! come on, I thought the liberals were the most embracing bunch of that lifestyle - and suddenly it is so BAD - what side of the fence are you guys on)? Foley has resigned - he isn't staying around like your 2 guys. And now you want Hastert to resign? After your guys stayed in after actually doing the deed with many? WHATEVER.
2006-10-04 06:40:21 · answer #7 · answered by Jacki 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They'll be saying how great the Bush tax cuts were for the economy.
2006-10-04 06:31:05 · answer #8 · answered by notme 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I VOTED FOR BUSH. THE OTHER GUYS (GORE/KERRY )
WERE JOKES. IF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WAS ABLE TO COME UP WITH A DECENT CANDIDATE THEN WE MAY NOT HAVE HAD ALL THE PROBLEMS WE HAVE TODAY. THE INABILITY FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY TO COME UP WITH A VIABLE LEADER SHOWS THE STATE OF THE DEMO'S. WHO WILL THEY SEND UP IN 2008 ? NOT HILLARY. 40 % OF THE COUNTRY IS NOT WILLING TO VOTE FOR A WOMAN NO MATTER WHO SHE IS. THE DEMO'S ARE INCAPABLE OF FINDING A VIABLE INTELLIGENT CANDIDATE. HOW BAD ARE THE PROSPECTS FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? FIND A DECENT CANDIDATE AND THE PEOPLE MAY VOTE FOR HIM/HER. THE DEMOCRATIC PROSPECTS HAVE BEEN SO BAD THAT BUSH IS THE LEADER. SEND A DECENT CANDIDATE THAT THE PEOPLE CAN TRUST AND FEEL SAFE WITH. TIL THEN WE'RE STUCK WITH THE REPUBLICAN AGENDA.
2006-10-04 06:37:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I didnt even vote, so no i wont e admitting or denying anything. I AM voting from now on thought, i dont want to be part of the problem when we give up our country to liberals.
2006-10-04 06:35:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Wish on liberal moron. I voted for President Bush twice and would happily do so again were it possible. My ONLY gripe with him is that he hasn't expanded the war to include Syria, Iran and N. Korea. You peace-lovers are such cowards.
2006-10-04 06:32:26 · answer #11 · answered by Wayne H 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋