English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Was there a political agenda to his assassination?
Did Lee Harvey Oswald kill John Kennedy by himself, or did a conspiracy do it?
Who gained from it?

2006-10-04 07:18:43 · 31 answers · asked by Andy H 3 in Politics & Government Politics

31 answers

Why?

1. Failed to give Israel Atom Bombs.
2. Relieved 2 top Generals in Europe.
3. Failed "Bay of Pigs" CIA Operation.
4. Involvement with Marylin Monroe.
5. Friction between advisors, senators, and staff.
6. His brother "Attorney General" caused many problems with the Costa Nostra (Largest Mafia Families).

How?

3 Man Assassination team unknown to Lee Harvey Oswald. Kennedy hit from front, rear and from the oblique (grassy knoll). Technique is used by several intelligence services around the world.

Who gained from it?

a. Vice President Johnson.
b. Colt Firearms Manufacture.
c. US Military.
d. Defense Weapons Contractors.
e. US Military.
f. The Mafia.
g. Israel (President Johnson sold the Atom Bomb to Israel).
h. Hughes Aircraft.

Now, if you have some room, you can build a terrain model of Dallas, get some little model cars, etc., and using the technical known data, ballistics from Lee Harvey Oswald's 6mm Italian bolt action rifle, etc., etc., you can measure with a laser pen where Kennedy was shot from, etc., etc., and you will clearly see that Lee Harvey Oswald had no chance of hitting the president!

2006-10-04 07:28:29 · answer #1 · answered by Fitforlife 4 · 3 0

GOOD QUESTION. The one thing I can tell you for sure is that Lee Harvey Oswald did NOT do it by himself. More than 15 witnesses on Dealey Plaza that day reported seeing President Kennedy's head "explode" with a "cone" of blood and brain matter going out the back of his head when the final shot was fired. That's completely inconsistent with someone shooting a high-power rifle with NATO ball-round ammunition from the rear. It's 100% consistent with a shot from the front-right by a pistol or rifle using a "dum-dum" round that is designed to flatten and tumble on impact for maximum damage. There WAS a second shooter -- they actually have a picture taken at the moment the final shot was fired showing a man in a police uniform standing behind the fence on the grassy knoll holding what appears to be a rifle. Heck, the picture even caught the flash as the gun was fired. No question about it: There were at least two shooters, and Oswald may not have even been one of them, so you definitely have a conspiracy.

So who did it? That's the question we will probably never have an answer for. Some claim it was a Mafia hit, motivated by all the trouble JFK's Attorney General (his brother Bobby) gave them. Others claim it was a government conspiracy involving the Secret Service, the CIA, and the Department of Defense at the very least, motivated by JFK's stance on Cuba and Vietnam. There's even a recent book out that claims it was all orchestrated by the man who took over as President, Lyndon Baines Johnson, and he simply did it because he was under investigation for some serious political shenannigans that would have ruined his career, so he had JFK assassinated to get the heat off. One thing is for sure: The Warren Commission Report is almost pure fiction from start to finish. It wasn't Oswald the communist sympathizer who did it -- he may not have had anything to do with it other than being the fall-guy.

2006-10-04 07:42:56 · answer #2 · answered by sarge927 7 · 0 1

Lee Harvey Oswald did NOT kill JFK because of the different entry points of the bullets, also the area they say Lee Harvey Oswald was shooting from it would have been impossible for him to be there and at other places were a secretary saw him eating a sandwich

the so called "wonder bullet" theory was so ridiculous it's amazing. and there were many who were willing to give various evidence that would have shown there couldn't be a lone shooter,however the witness were murdered. also no president has that little protection round them with the top down on their car.

the conspiracy is that JFK didn't want Vietnam to happen but as it happens War is the biggest form of an economy booster so if he didn't allow the war many important people would have lost a lot of money

oh there too much too it but i know for sure it was a government assassination job.

2006-10-04 07:38:41 · answer #3 · answered by L£X 2 · 1 1

I believe there was an agenda behind JFK's assassination and at that time only some politicians benefited from this.However, the whole incident is just murky. Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested because he had killed a policeman; he never admitted to killing JFK.Then Jack Ruby, a mafia member, comes along and guns down Lee Harvey Oswald.
So many irregularities transpired such as the autopsy itself was not carried out in the state of Texas but in Washington thus Texas law was broken. Again the pathologist behind the autopsy was under immense pressure to just get on with the job and finish it quickly.
To date, the whole assassination is just shrouded in mystery and noone has any clue as to who organised this assassination.But whoever it is (individual or group), must be turning in their graves because the integration of blacks and whites did take root in the USA.

2006-10-04 08:13:31 · answer #4 · answered by marizani 4 · 0 1

First Oswald didn't shoot anyone.
Now JFK was killed for many reasons.

1 LBJ knew he wasn't going to be on the ticket in 64, and he so wanted the presidency.
2 Hoover was nearing manditory retirement age, and couldn't someone else running his baby( the FBI).
3 CIA blamed him for not providing air cover during the bay of pigs fiasco, and hated him form trying to get rid of the CIA, and he was also singned NSAMs that would have ALL US troops out Vietnam by the end of 65, and they wanted thier war.
4 the Mafia thought they bought him, they didn't, and wanted revenge.
that's the four biggest, too many more to list. so does that answer your question?

2006-10-04 07:33:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

My personal theory is that Kennedy wouldnt invade Cuba when the CIA wanted him too. Also I believe that Kennedy was never supposed to win that election,his father bought it for him. LBJ was a democrat turned republican who kennedy was told he needed to run with in order to take the south. My guess is that putting LBJ in as vp is hedging their bets. Kennedy however has his own wonderful ideas about what america should be that didnt jibe with what they want so they killed him.
Im still not too sure who the they are, but I firmly believe there are a group of people who control this country and its not the elected officials.

2006-10-04 07:30:49 · answer #6 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 1 1

imo it had everything to do with executive order 11110 which would have abolished the corrupt federal reserve system, the CIA, and pulled us out of vietnam ... he stepped on too many powerful toes ... but he did it for the common man ... the united states would be in a completely different, and better imo, situation at the present time if that executive order had been enforced ...it is still on the books btw.

2006-10-04 07:25:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Did you not see Dave Chappelle explain the magic bullet that killed Kennedy in one of his episodes? Watch JFK. There is defenately something fishy going on with what really happened that day in Texas.

2006-10-04 07:23:26 · answer #8 · answered by Sleazy P. Martini 1 · 3 1

Of course it was a conspiracy, that's common knowledge nowadays. killed because his staff, i.e. generals in the forces didn't agree with his ideas and overseas policies. he wanted to pull out of Vietnam. so he was assassinated so that his generals could step up their campaign in Vietnam.

2006-10-04 07:28:10 · answer #9 · answered by 90210 aka Hummer Lover 6 · 1 1

no, it was not lho... and anyone who believes that it was a single shot ia an idiot. our government assassinated jfk. jfk was way ahead of the times and our GOVERNMENT took him out. lyndon johnson was just another pawn in the game. and what a shame. why can't someone get rid of bush??

2006-10-04 07:30:37 · answer #10 · answered by Jennifer B 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers