Politics - 11 July 2006

2006-07-11 04:56:29 · 10 answers · asked by barbaradjt 5

First off, I want to thank all the Conservatives out there who stand up for their princables on this board. Growing up in Massachusetts finding someone that shares my ideology was rare.

My inspiration was Ronald Reagan. I came of age in the 80's and after reading his speaches and reading books about him, I was inspired.

2006-07-11 04:51:22 · 13 answers · asked by Billy C 2

tick
tock
tick
tock
tick
tock

What entertained me the most was reading the dependable liberal retards on this site frothing at the mouth with "those hateful Christians", "that son-of-a-Bush", "legislating morality". I particularly like that last one, as if most forms of legislation are not based on some moral judgement that the people want imposed. MORONS.

2006-07-11 04:45:57 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Constitution clearly states there should be a separation of church and state. Based on what some people say, they believe marriage is a *sacred* institution that is defined in the *Bible* as the union of a man and a woman. To me, that sounds like a lot of church mixing with state.

I think the State should issue certificates for "Civil Unions" to individuals who wish to live together. Regardless of the sex of either partner. The "civil union" is for any two people choosing to commit themselves to each other and be recognised by the State as one.

THEN, if a couple wants to get "married", they go to a church and get married. However, they are still recognised by the state as a civil union. So marriages would be handled by the Church, not the State. If the Church thinks it's wrong to marry two men or two women, then they don't have to do it. No debate. That's their perogative.

I know it will never happen. It's just a hypothetical suggestion, but one that would be ideal, i think.

2006-07-11 04:36:21 · 17 answers · asked by iu_runner 2

money from the US! Arent responsible for upholding white supremacy and Zionism? And mostly the racist there are Amerikkkan born?

2006-07-11 04:34:16 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

what happened to the real issues like the economy, wages, jobs.

2006-07-11 04:20:37 · 12 answers · asked by david c 4

I’ve been thinking about some things that I have been seeing here. I read a comment earlier that stated that all Muslims are terrorists and I wanted to open this topic.
First thing I would like to bring up is that our system is based on the separation of church and state. Our language, the way we believe and the way we conduct ourselves is determined by our society. Our ability to understand is limited to our sociological experience. Islam is the combination of church and state. When you make that the baseline of society things are a little different. The Arabic language itself cannot be truly translated to English because of the basis for it’s creation. The language often references the inshalllah “if god wills it”. Let me site an example:
Think about freedom of religion. If our right to be whatever we want here was infringed upon, well we would go to court.
In the muslim world, when they say “You are infringing on Islam” basically means that you are causing a general oppression of the people. It does not mean we are trying to keep them from practicing their religion, which we take it to mean. Why would they say that?

2006-07-11 04:03:12 · 4 answers · asked by abehagenston 2

They also say we are overweight because we eat fast food, last time I checked Simon Cowell had man boobs. Maybe it would be better to say the U.S. isn't as vain as Europe. Their men over there wear tight jeans, and tight shirts, which sounds like our women. Here in the states we call that metrosexual because we know that men are supposed to act like men. They give us crap about our medical system because we don't have a socialized medicare system. If you ask me I would rather have private medical insurance because I don't like waiting 2 months if I need an MRI, and I don't like waiting in line for 3 hours to get my perscriptions filled. So keeping on wearing those Prada shoes and complaining when they get ruined because you stepped in dog crap, and we will keep on being "arrogant." But then again noone asked me so maybe I am just rambling.

2006-07-11 04:00:05 · 9 answers · asked by Phil My Crack In 4

2006-07-11 03:49:16 · 8 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

Is it then O.K. for Ann COulter to use their experience to promote her own agenda? I asked a question about how Ann could say these women are enjoying their husbands deaths, and most answered that the widows shouldn't use their loss to further theri political agenda. Is it O.K. for Ann to use THEIR loss for HER own political agenda? Somehow it seems worse to me what Ann is doing. What do you think?

2006-07-11 03:48:36 · 21 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

You HAVE to chose a party I will not take no party as an answer.

2006-07-11 03:47:20 · 10 answers · asked by Kip Thorne 1

2006-07-11 03:20:51 · 13 answers · asked by a_poor_misguided_soul 5

well ... i live in israel , am not jew ... i am arab and i just woundered about what people think about palestine and arab people as a whole , do u feel 4 them or u hate them !? and why do u have them !? {or us} ?

2006-07-11 03:15:01 · 21 answers · asked by delayla 2

2006-07-11 03:06:17 · 21 answers · asked by sparky 2

Everyone knows him and wife condi knew about 9/11 before hand, but now sources say he piloted at least one of the planes. Is this true, and how many of them was he flying?

2006-07-11 02:58:55 · 28 answers · asked by trisha m 2

If so, why do fundamentalist Christians give the party their unswerving support?

2006-07-11 02:49:11 · 15 answers · asked by kevyn_uk 2

This question is for people in other country's, not for those living in the U.S., So if you live in the United States or are a U.S. Citizen living abroad please be respectful and don’t answer.

2006-07-11 02:32:57 · 9 answers · asked by The Prez. 4

Why do people vote for politician that they really know they are not good for their country?
Why do they confuse politics and believe that they have to give their vote to their “team”? Are we stupid or they make us believe that by voting the other team is a betrayal?

2006-07-11 02:24:49 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-11 02:14:33 · 14 answers · asked by key2x4y 2

Having grown up in the South, my experiences have shown me that most of the people supporting Republican Politicans also tend to be racist. It might not be that way in the rest of the country....

2006-07-11 02:07:55 · 18 answers · asked by conservativeguyfromnc 2

2006-07-11 02:03:18 · 5 answers · asked by boddy refat 1

lots of people disagreed with the war in iraq, etc. how come we dont get a say on particular issues? wouldnt democratic mean we get a 'voice' on all issues?

2006-07-11 01:55:32 · 17 answers · asked by The Cheesecake King 1

it seems with the the current setup, during the first term the president often worries about campaigning and getting re-elected. would the six year term which is what our senators serve be more effective.

2006-07-11 01:53:46 · 15 answers · asked by david c 4

There have been calls for Condi to run for presidency, but lets face it can someone single ever get elected as president. Marriage is a big responsibility and Challenge and i feel those who are single or who have been divorced don't have a business trying to rule a nation

2006-07-11 01:43:24 · 12 answers · asked by voodoo 2

To remove the bulb?
To put the new one in?
Why?

A different person must be used for each of the above.

Also, whose lightbulb is it?

Anyone who treats one party better than the other will automatically be excluded from consideration from getting best answer. You can be nice to both parties or dump on them, but you must be even-handed.

2006-07-11 01:31:18 · 8 answers · asked by SPLATT 7

does terror mean:targeting civilians?there were tens of southands of Iraqi civilians were killed by Americans and more than 4,000 palestinians were killed by Israelis...is it who began it? only America said that Iraq had mass distruction weapons which was never proved,and then every body knew that these information was wrong even CIA has confessed that..
Who can tell me the objective definition of terror? and why it hasn't a definition yet?
on what basis we judge an action as terror or war against terror regardless the religion of militants or fighter?

2006-07-11 01:27:30 · 14 answers · asked by mohamed.kapci 3

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060710/ap_on_re_af/africa_aid_skeptics_lh1

2006-07-11 01:27:13 · 2 answers · asked by turntable 6

This is America and don't you have a right to speak your mind . When your screaming all that hate at each other then your mind is closed . Both sides have good points and we could learn something about each other if we take the time to listen . This is your fellow American your talking to . Take the time to hear what is being said .

2006-07-11 01:16:08 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-11 00:58:42 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

I had an offer to go dive with another libatrd who promised to make sure I return safely. Im sensing this is not in my best interest but what do you think? Would my regulator all of a sudeen malfunction, would a hole find a way to my line, would he start feeding small fish in hopes of attracting predators? hmmmm

2006-07-11 00:56:58 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous